Contra Costa Judge Ordered Removed From Office for 'Significant' Misconduct
If the order removing Judge John Laettner stands, he will be the second Contra Costa judge barred from office in the last 15 months. Laettner had disputed the claims.
November 06, 2019 at 03:37 PM
5 minute read
The Commission on Judicial Performance has voted to oust Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge John Laettner from office for "a significant amount of misconduct," including "a pattern" of inappropriate behavior toward women.
Laettner, a 13-year veteran of the bench, was accused last year of nine counts of misconduct, including 28 allegations of wrongdoing ranging from making inappropriate comments about women's appearances and demeanors to revoking a defendant's own recognizance release without giving him or his attorney a chance to be heard.
"Much of Judge Laettner's misconduct reflects a pattern of engaging with attorneys appearing before him in a manner that is governed by his emotions, rather than by the California Code of Judicial Ethics," the commission wrote in a 76-page order. "His desire to have certain attorneys like him and not be upset or 'mad at him' about his rulings, and action he has taken when he was angry or upset with them, has, at times, overridden his compliance with the canons of judicial ethics."
The commission's removal order becomes final in 30 days, giving Laettner an opportunity to petition the California Supreme Court for review. Laettner's attorney, James Murphy of Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney, was not immediately reached for comment. Laettner had disputed the allegations against him.
A Contra Costa County Superior Court spokesman issued a statement Wednesday saying "the court respects the decision of the Commission on Judicial Performance. Judge Laettner has been removed from our bench pending the outcome of any appeal to the California Supreme Court."
The commission's vote to remove Laettner from office was not unanimous. Three of the 11 commissioners—Justice William Dato of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lisa Lench and public members Richard Simpson—would have chosen to publicly censure Laettner.
If Laettner's removal order stands, he will be the second Contra Costa judge barred from office in the last 15 months. In August 2018, the commission censured retired Judge Bruce Clayton Mills and ordered that he never hold judicial office in California again. Mills had been reprimanded by commissioners five times over a 17-year period.
After the initial charges were announced, Laettner's attorney said the complaints, many of which involve deputy public defenders, stemmed from a dispute between the judge and the public defender's office over the use of cash bail.
The commissioners said Laettner "had an exemplary work ethic" and has been "a responsible, conscientious judge, and an asset to his court." If only his misconduct was considered, the commission continued, "we would impose a censure."
"But given our mandate to uphold high standards of judicial conduct, protect the public, and preserve the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, it is Judge Laettner's lack of candor during this proceeding, and his selective and limited acknowledgment of his misconduct, that leads us to conclude that removal from the bench is the appropriate discipline."
Four of the nine counts against Laettner stemmed from comments the judge allegedly made to women in his courtroom about their physical appearance, their tattoos and their ethnicity.
"You often told other female defendants charged with driving under the influence that they were pretty, and that they should not drink and drive or they might get scars," according to the commission's initial charging report. In 2017, Laettner allegedly told a deputy public defender who is part Japanese-American that he "knew some 'very beautiful half-Japanese twins in college,' or words to that effect. [He] also asked her intrusive questions about her racial ancestry, background and upbringing," the commission alleged.
The commission also found that Laettner made repeated, unwelcome comments about his court reporter, calling her "so pretty" and "hot" and telling jurors they would "enjoy looking at her." Laettner said he may have publicly referred to the reporter as "his lovely court reporter" but denied every saying they would enjoy looking at her. The reporter testified that she transferred out of Laettner's courtroom in 2017 because she "could not take the years of unwelcome and inappropriate comments toward [herself] and others," the commission wrote.
Laettner, a former Tulare County prosecutor, served as an assistant U.S. attorney in California's Northern District between 1989 and 2006. He was then appointed to the Contra Costa bench by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Read the Commission on Judicial Performance's order:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
5 minute readAdvisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
3 minute readSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250