Judge to Let Cooley Bow Out of Representing Elizabeth Holmes in Theranos Civil Case
The firm in late September asked to withdraw from a civil case in Arizona federal court, saying Holmes hasn't paid them in more than a year and likely won't be able to going forward.
November 07, 2019 at 11:49 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge overseeing civil litigation against blood-testing company Theranos has indicated he will let lawyers at Cooley who have been representing former CEO Elizabeth Holmes withdraw from the case.
In a motion filed on Sept. 30, Cooley chairman Stephen Neal, Palo Alto partner-in-charge John Dwyer and associate Jeffrey Lombard asked to bow out of the case, saying Holmes hasn't paid them for more than a year for their work on the case and likely never will.
Lead plaintiffs attorneys at Keller Rohrback and Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, who are pursuing claims of fraud and medical battery against Holmes, her company and Walgreens, filed court papers last month indicating that they didn't oppose Cooley's withdrawal. But they added that Holmes' lawyers at Cooley hadn't fulfilled a local rule requiring them to provide the plaintiffs with their client's last known residence and phone number prior to their release from the case.
Senior District Judge H. Russel Holland indicated in an order dated Tuesday and posted to the docket on Wednesday that, given the notoriety of the case, he would allow the Cooley lawyers to withdraw, provided they filed Holmes' email and last known address with the court under seal.
"For purposes of effecting routine communications, the court concludes that use of an email address for routine communications with Ms. Holmes will be appropriate as an alternative to a telephone number," Russel said in the ruling.
"Upon the filing of a notice by a Cooley attorney that the foregoing information (an email address and current physical address for Holmes) have been filed under seal, the court will grant counsel's motion to withdraw," wrote Holland, an Alaska-based judge who is overseeing the Theranos multidistrict litigation as a visiting judge in the District of Arizona.
A spokesperson for Cooley could not be reached for comment at the time of publication.
Holmes didn't respond to questions about the unpaid Cooley bills, as she was leaving a court appearance Monday in the criminal case pending against her in federal court in San Jose, according to a report from CNBC.
The criminal trial of Theranos' founders has been scheduled to start in the summer of 2020. At a pretrial hearing in June, Judge Edward Davila of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California set jury selection in the criminal case for July 28, 2020, with a trial to follow Aug. 4.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
6 minute readJudge Approves 23andMe's $30M Data Breach Settlement - With Conditions
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250