After Becerra Goes to Court, Facebook to Comply With Calif. AG's Investigation
Next week, the company will begin providing answers to the agency's 19 interrogatories issued in June.
November 20, 2019 at 07:39 PM
4 minute read
Facebook has agreed to participate in California's investigation into its privacy practices nearly two weeks after Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced a lawsuit against the social media giant for failing to respond to the office's inquiries.
By Nov. 26, the Menlo Park-based company will begin providing answers to the agency's 19 interrogatories issued in June, according to a stipulated order signed by San Francisco Superior Judge Ethan Schulman this week. Facebook's counsel in the matter include Sonal Mehta of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in San Francisco and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Joshua Lipshutz.
Becerra filed a petition for a court order Nov. 6 in San Francisco Superior Court to compel Facebook to comply with his office's inquiry over the tech company's potential privacy infractions in the wake of its Cambridge Analytica scandal. Up until now, Facebook had dodged the department's most recent subpoenas and did not respond to a prior 2018 request for documents for a full year, the attorney general reported at a press conference earlier this month. Becerra said at the time he had "no choice" but to make the investigation public.
Facebook will also hand over non-privileged documents listed in the office's six document requests by early January. Both parties are set to meet before Schulman on Feb. 19 to argue any remaining disputes related to the court order.
"We have cooperated extensively with the State of California's investigation by providing thousands of pages of written responses and hundreds of thousands of documents over the past year," said Will Castleberry, vice president of state and local public policy for Facebook, in an emailed response. "We look forward to continued cooperation and resolving the attorney general's remaining requests."
When it comes to requests for Facebook documents, the California AG has plenty of company. At least 47 other attorneys general are digging into anticompetitive practices that could have put user data at risk. Becerra has refused to answer questions about any cooperation with other state law enforcement agencies, but said "How do you know we are not teaming up with others?" when announcing the court order.
Joe Simons, chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, also confirmed at the American Bar Association 2019 Antitrust Fall Forum on Monday that the agency's Technology Enforcement Division launched an investigation into Facebook and other major platforms' alleged anticompetitive practices, according to Business Insider.
Regulatory agencies' Cambridge Analytica-related document requests have also become a focal point of multidistrict litigation against the company stemming from alleged user privacy abuses. At a hearing earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California suggested possibly forcing Facebook to hand over documents provided to U.S. regulators to lawyers pursuing privacy claims against the company in multidistrict litigation he's overseeing.
Facebook, the company's counsel and Becerra's office did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readChief Justice Patricia Guerrero Says Recent Drop in Straight Grants Isn't Permanent
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 3NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 4Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 5DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250