LA-Area Law School to Remain Open, but Parts Ways With the ABA
Trustees at the University of La Verne have voted to drop ABA accreditation for its law school and instead become accredited by the State Bar of California.
November 21, 2019 at 01:02 PM
5 minute read
The University of La Verne will keep its law school open, but as a California-accredited campus instead of one blessed by the American Bar Association.
The university's board of trustees Monday voted to convert the law school from ABA accreditation to accreditation by the State Bar of California—a move that will make it easier for the Ontario, California, campus to meet program standards. But it will also mean that graduates are only eligible to take the bar exam in California, at least initially. About 240 students are enrolled at the school.
Under the new plan, La Verne would become the first law school to drop its ABA accreditation in the wake of that body adopting tougher bar exam standards. The ABA in 2018 changed that standard, giving law schools two years instead of five years to ensure that at least 75% of their graduates pass the licensing exam.
That heightened standard was one factor that prompted the board of trustees last month to order a full-scale review of the La Verne's law school and its sustainability. The school's long-term finances were another catalyst for the review, officials said.
"The California bar standards are lower for bar pass rates than what the ABA is, but I think the board still has high expectations for how the school will perform and student success," said university spokesman Rod Leveque in an interview Thursday. "There probably was a path forward for the college of law in which it could have put a lot of dollars into the ABA program and get it to the point where it could meet the new ABA standard, but at what cost? What would we have to sacrifice in terms of mission and in terms of financial obligations?"
Should La Verne successfully convert to California accreditation, it would become the seventh school to disappear from the ranks of ABA-accredited campuses since 2015. (That figure includes the 2015 merger of William Mitchell College of Law and Hamline University School of Law.) And it would be the second law school in Southern California to leave the ABA roles. Whittier Law School, about 40 miles to the south in Costa Mesa, is in its final year of operation. University officials in 2017 decided to shut the school down amid falling enrollment and financial shortfalls.
La Verne's board of trustees in October voted to form two committees to investigate the law school's prospects—one composed of faculty and the other of administrators—to issue recommendations. Neither committee recommended closing the law school, but committee members offered a wide array of views on what should happen with the law school, Leveque said.
Not counting the soon-to-close Whittier, California is home to 20 ABA-accredited law schools. (Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego had its ABA-accreditation revoked in June, but it remains accredited while it appeals that decision.) Meanwhile, 21 other law schools are accredited by the State Bar of California.
Graduates of California-accredited law schools tend not to perform as well on the state's bar exam. Graduates of ABA-accredited law schools had a 71% first-time pass rate on the July 2019 exam. That figure was 26% for graduates of California-accredited schools. Graduates of California-accredited law schools are eligible to sit for the bar in 19 other jurisdictions, but in most cases they must first pass the California exam then practice for a certain number of years before taking the exam elsewhere.
The bar exam has long been a sticking point for La Verne's law school, which opened in 1970 but did not seek ABA accreditation until 1996. It took 17 years for the school to gain full ABA accreditation, largely due to its poor bar exam results. Just 32% of its graduates who took the licensing exam in 2018 passed. The school first gained provisional accreditation in 2006, but that status lapsed in 2011 after the ABA declined to extend full accreditation, citing low bar-passage rates. The ABA reinstated the school's provisional status the following year in time for graduates to be eligible to sit for the bar exam, and the school gained full accreditation in 2016.
La Verne president Devorah Lieberman said in an announcement of the decision that seeking California accreditation "returns the college to its roots."
The board of trustees has requested a transition plan by Dec. 16. All current La Verne law students will graduate with a degree from an ABA-accredited law school. But plans call for a phase in under which new students would start the California-accredited program, perhaps as early as next fall, Leveque said.
Reaction to the decision to seek accreditation from the State Bar of California has run the gamut, according to Leveque.
"Obviously, people are concerned," he said. "Anytime there is change there can be anxiety. But we have tried to engage the faculty and students in the process and make sure they know what's going on."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250