California Legal Departments Increase Spending on Outside Counsel
Like law departments in the rest of the country, cost control for legal departments in California remains a high priority. Companies in California reported an 8% increase in legal spend this year.
November 22, 2019 at 04:23 PM
3 minute read
In-house legal trends in California are largely similar to the rest of the country, however, more legal departments in the Golden State have increased outside counsel spend compared to their counterparts in other states, according to data collected by HBR Consulting.
At the beginning of November, HBR Consulting collected data from the legal departments of 207 companies nationwide. Thirty of the law departments that responded are in California.
Like law departments in the rest of the country, cost control for legal departments in California remains a high priority. Companies in California reported an 8% increase in legal spend this year. Specifically, legal departments in California reported an 18% increase in outside counsel spending. Nationwide, companies reported an average of only a 3% increase in outside counsel spend.
"We saw nationally that there are other methods of addressing legal demand," Lauren Chung, managing director at HBR Consulting, said.
Chung said the increase in outside counsel spend in California may have to do with the number of different legal services or alternative legal service providers in the area.
Where legal departments in California are ahead of their counterparts elsewhere is in the use of legal technology and legal operations. The data shows that 100% of California respondents have an electronic billing system in place and 89% have implemented matter management systems. The top technology used by other legal departments in the rest of the country is board management systems and only 84% of respondents nationwide indicated that they have a board management system in place.
Chung said she's found legal departments in California are more open to the use of technology. That openness to trying new technology, she said is largely driven by legal operations, which California also appears to be ahead of the rest of the country's corporate legal departments.
"Legal operations is what is driving technology initiatives," Chung said.
The survey showed that 57% of legal departments in California have a team of individuals with formal legal operations responsibilities. Only 43% of companies in the rest of the country indicated they have a dedicated legal operations function.
Chung said because of organizations like the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium starting in California, there was an early recognition that legal operations could be an effective cost-saving measure.
"There was an early recognition in organizations to have that perspective; that legal operations can have a significant role in the legal department," Chung said. "It had its roots in California and a lot of momentum built up in that region."
The investment in outside counsel, legal operations and legal technology is all in efforts to meet increasing legal demand. Nationwide, 88% of respondents indicated they are seeing an increase in legal demand because of regulations, new technology and other issues. Eighty-one percent of the California respondents also indicated they are seeing an increase in legal demand.
"The legal demand [in California] is consistent with what we're seeing more broadly," Chung said.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 2Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 3Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 4Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
- 5'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250