Modoc County Judge Is Disciplined for Undisclosed Friendship With Attorney
A lawyer for Judge David A. Mason said he "respects the commission's decision and looks forward to continuing his service to the people of Modoc County."
December 03, 2019 at 06:48 PM
3 minute read
The Commission on Judicial Performance on Tuesday disciplined a Modoc County judge for failing to note on the record his friendship with a lawyer who regularly appeared before him.
Judge David Mason, a 10-year veteran of Modoc County's two-judge court, was publicly admonished for "overstat[ing] his diligence" in disclosing a "personal and sustained" relationship with attorney Tom Gifford as required by judicial canons.
"Even if Judge Mason was not disqualified from presiding over Mr. Gifford's cases, he was required to disclose all facts about their relationship that were reasonably relevant to disqualification, on the record, in every case in which Mr. Gifford appeared," the commissioners wrote in their admonishment order. "Judge Mason presented no evidence that he ever did so, and concedes that he did not make a disclosure in every case where he was required to do so."
David McMonigle, a Long & Levit partner who represented Mason in the disciplinary matter, said the judge "respects the commission's decision and looks forward to continuing his service to the people of Modoc County."
Mason and Giffords were friends in the rural county of about 9,600—which includes approximately 10 locally based, regularly practicing attorneys, McMonigle said—when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed Mason to the bench in 2009. Their families vacationed together in Italy for two weeks in 2013. Gifford moved to Texas shortly after the trip, and Mason visited there twice.
Gifford returned to Modoc County in 2017 to become the conflicts attorney for indigent defense and appeared before Mason 86 times that year, according to the commission.
When first contacted by a commission investigator in December 2018, Mason said his friendship with Gifford never influenced how he handled a case and that he "always and routinely" made the proper public disclosures "in every case where ethics and fairness made it necessary and expedient."
Four months later, Mason backtracked, telling investigators he could not "stand by such definitive statements" about his disclosures "with absolute confidence."
"Judge Mason did not provide any evidence that he had ever made any disclosure on the record in any case in which Mr. Gifford had appeared," the commission concluded.
Mason has since drafted a proposed disclosure that he will put on the record when Gifford appears in a case in his courtroom, according to the commission.
Ten members of the commission voted to publicly admonish Mason. One member, Kay Cooperman Jue, voted to privately admonish the judge.
Read more:
Contra Costa Judge Ordered Removed for 'Significant' Misconduct
Inyo Judge Disciplined for Missing Casework Deadlines
Santa Cruz Judge Censured for Denying Red-Light Violation Responsibility
Former El Dorado Judge Is Banned From Serving on Bench Ever Again
Two Trial Court Judges Disciplined for Poor Demeanor on the Bench
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250