Two Rival Political Law Powerhouses Merge as Olson Remcho
"The thought of a merger has always been flirted with," said Richard Rios, managing partner of Olson Hagel & Fishburn, merging with Remcho Johansen & Purcell.
December 03, 2019 at 03:48 PM
4 minute read
Two California firms with long-standing ties to state Democrats, labor unions and organizations behind many of the progressive ballot initiatives drafted in recent years will merge Jan. 1.
Olson Hagel & Fishburn and Remcho Johansen & Purcell will become Olson Remcho, the firms said Tuesday. The new political law firm will include 22 attorneys in Long Beach, Oakland and Sacramento.
Olson Remcho will represent Gov. Gavin Newsom, state Senate leader Toni Atkins and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon as well as several members of the California congressional delegation and a dozen labor unions. Lawyers at the firm will continue to advise candidates, lobbyists, ballot measure campaigns and political action committees.
"The thought of a merger has always been flirted with," said Olson Hagel managing partner Richard Rios. Those thoughts became real discussions after Richard Miadich, Olson Hagel's primary litigation partner, left the firm to become chairman of the Fair Political Practices Commission in May.
"The point where the two firms are in their succession plans, the timing worked out," Rios said.
Known for its nuts-and-bolts political compliance work, Olson Hagel was founded in 1977 by Lance Olson, who ran campaigns while attending night classes at the University of Pacific's McGeorge School of Law. Olson has advised the California Democratic Party since 1982 and served as counsel to politically active labor unions.
Olson's firm, with offices in Sacramento and Long Beach, has drafted dozens of ballot initiatives, including the 2010 measure reducing the legislative vote requirement to pass a budget in California from two-thirds to a simple majority. Attorneys at the firm also co-wrote the 2016 measure legalizing recreational marijuana.
Remcho Johansen was created in 1983 by Robin Johansen, Joseph Remcho and Kathleen Purcell, three veterans of education finance lawsuits that challenged unequal funding among school districts. The Oakland-based firm is known for its litigation and government law work. Its client list has included the California Teachers Association, the United Farm Workers of America and the League of California Cities.
Remcho Johansen partner James Harrison helped write the 2004 stem cell initiative that generated $3 billion for research and served previously as the research agency's general counsel. Harrison also drafted the 2018 California Consumer Privacy Act, the proposed ballot measure that became the state's landmark data-protection law.
Remcho Johansen partner Karen Getman said Tuesday that some people have been surprised by the merger announcement, "thinking, oooh, you're rivals."
"But really we've been friends and co-workers for a number of years," she said. "It's the perfect resolution."
The three offices now operated by the two firms will remain open, Rios and Getman said, giving the merged practices an expanded footprint in Northern California. "Very, very few" client conflicts have been created by the merger, Getman added.
The new firm's mission will remain focused on political law, they said.
"Out of the box I expect most everything will be very similar for our clients," Rios said. "I don't expect a lot of change."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
3 minute readSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Trending Stories
- 1Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 2Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 3Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 4Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 5Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250