California Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye Eyes Another 12-Year Term
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said she has a good relationship with Gov. Gavin Newsom. "He's available and he's open," she said. "And he's very open to explanations by the judiciary and seeking information."
December 11, 2019 at 06:18 PM
4 minute read
California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said Wednesday she expects to run for retention when her current 12-year term is up in 2022.
Talking to reporters at an annual gathering in San Francisco, Cantil-Sakauye called her post as chief justice "the greatest job" and said "I don't know where you go from this."
"I'm excited by what good we can do," Cantil-Sakauye said. "I'm excited by whatever the next budget brings and whatever programs we get to introduce because I think we're being proactive and creative."
As she approaches her 10th year as the leader of California's judiciary, Cantil-Sakauye finds herself on firmer political and fiscal ground than she did when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed her in 2010.
The great recession has given way to state budgets with soaring revenues and hundreds of millions of additional dollars for courts and new judges. Critics within the judiciary who questioned her effectiveness have largely quieted. And the chief justice now has a full slate of colleagues to work with on the Supreme Court after Gov. Jerry Brown filled a two-year vacancy in 2018.
Cantil-Sakauye made headlines last year when she switched her political party registration from Republican to no party preference, citing the politicization of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings. She also acknowledged being asked to run for governor in 2018, something she later described as "a surprise" and "fantasy."
There was no talk of future political aspirations Wednesday, as Cantil-Sakauye said she has a good relationship with Gov. Gavin Newsom.
"He's available and he's open," she said. "And he's very open to explanations by the judiciary and seeking information. Plus with his cadre of lawyers that advise him, it's just nice to have people who understand the judiciary and understand the role of lawyers and judges to help us."
As she faces her own retention campaign on the horizon, Cantil-Sakauye expressed support for California's system of judicial elections, including recalls.
"No system is perfect and that's probably the fundamental starting point," the chief justice said. "But yet I also think it's important that judges be accountable to voters."
Cantil-Sakauye said she supports longer terms for judges, such as the 12-year tenures for appellate justices.
"Ultimately I think that periodic review of a judge before the public doesn't do any harm," she said. "We have seen in other states where … that can be concerning but I also think there are avenues of education and relationships with lawyers and judges [having] a better relationship with their public. I hope we're able to confront those issues rather than insulating judges entirely from voters' review."
Last year, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky was recalled for what critics said was the lenient sentence he imposed on a Stanford University student convicted of sexual assault. Four San Francisco judges were challenged, too, because they were appointed by a Republican governor. Those judges were retained.
Cantil-Sakauye described recalls as "a powerful tool."
"And I think the question we have to ask ourselves is, are we willing to take it away. I don't think we are. And that's a debate that should be had outside the judiciary in a more public setting like the Legislature, where people can weigh in. I think it's the people's right to do that."
Read more:
California Justices Want Answers After Bar Exam Blunder
Q&A: Chief Justice of California on Challenging Norms
California's Chief Justice Raises New Alarms Over Immigration Arrests at Court
After Kavanaugh, California Chief Justice Drops Republican Affiliation
Judge Aaron Persky Loses Appellate Bid to Block Recall Effort
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
4 minute readFight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
Trending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Davis Wright Tremaine, Wilmer and More
- 2Forum Clause Axes $844M Case Against Reinsurer Over Deadly Plane Crash, Judge Rules
- 3Latham Adds Former Treasury Department Lawyer for Cross-Border Deal Guidance
- 4Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 5Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250