California Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye Eyes Another 12-Year Term
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said she has a good relationship with Gov. Gavin Newsom. "He's available and he's open," she said. "And he's very open to explanations by the judiciary and seeking information."
December 11, 2019 at 06:18 PM
4 minute read
California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye said Wednesday she expects to run for retention when her current 12-year term is up in 2022.
Talking to reporters at an annual gathering in San Francisco, Cantil-Sakauye called her post as chief justice "the greatest job" and said "I don't know where you go from this."
"I'm excited by what good we can do," Cantil-Sakauye said. "I'm excited by whatever the next budget brings and whatever programs we get to introduce because I think we're being proactive and creative."
As she approaches her 10th year as the leader of California's judiciary, Cantil-Sakauye finds herself on firmer political and fiscal ground than she did when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed her in 2010.
The great recession has given way to state budgets with soaring revenues and hundreds of millions of additional dollars for courts and new judges. Critics within the judiciary who questioned her effectiveness have largely quieted. And the chief justice now has a full slate of colleagues to work with on the Supreme Court after Gov. Jerry Brown filled a two-year vacancy in 2018.
Cantil-Sakauye made headlines last year when she switched her political party registration from Republican to no party preference, citing the politicization of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings. She also acknowledged being asked to run for governor in 2018, something she later described as "a surprise" and "fantasy."
There was no talk of future political aspirations Wednesday, as Cantil-Sakauye said she has a good relationship with Gov. Gavin Newsom.
"He's available and he's open," she said. "And he's very open to explanations by the judiciary and seeking information. Plus with his cadre of lawyers that advise him, it's just nice to have people who understand the judiciary and understand the role of lawyers and judges to help us."
As she faces her own retention campaign on the horizon, Cantil-Sakauye expressed support for California's system of judicial elections, including recalls.
"No system is perfect and that's probably the fundamental starting point," the chief justice said. "But yet I also think it's important that judges be accountable to voters."
Cantil-Sakauye said she supports longer terms for judges, such as the 12-year tenures for appellate justices.
"Ultimately I think that periodic review of a judge before the public doesn't do any harm," she said. "We have seen in other states where … that can be concerning but I also think there are avenues of education and relationships with lawyers and judges [having] a better relationship with their public. I hope we're able to confront those issues rather than insulating judges entirely from voters' review."
Last year, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky was recalled for what critics said was the lenient sentence he imposed on a Stanford University student convicted of sexual assault. Four San Francisco judges were challenged, too, because they were appointed by a Republican governor. Those judges were retained.
Cantil-Sakauye described recalls as "a powerful tool."
"And I think the question we have to ask ourselves is, are we willing to take it away. I don't think we are. And that's a debate that should be had outside the judiciary in a more public setting like the Legislature, where people can weigh in. I think it's the people's right to do that."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuspect in Courthouse Bombing Was Targeting Judge, Deputies, Say Prosecutors
4 minute readCourt Executive Promises Security Review After Explosion Injures 5 in Santa Maria Courthouse
3 minute readExplosion in Santa Maria Courthouse Injures Five, Shutters Operations
3 minute readCalifornia Judge Charged in Wife's Death Is Arrested on Suspicion of Drinking Alcohol While on Bail
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250