When To Leave a Job at Which You're Not Happy
If you have hit your wall and simply can't bear it anymore, start developing a strategy that will provide a course for the future.
December 11, 2019 at 06:17 PM
4 minute read
Q: I am a first year associate at a big law firm and I am miserable. Is it too soon to leave?
A: It depends. Generally speaking, one year (or less) isn't long to be employed before moving on to the next position. And it will usually raise questions for future employers. Whether the time is "too short" really depends on the context and circumstances. Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't.
If you are thinking about a move in-house, you are currently too junior to be competitive for these positions. The most junior in house roles in the market today tend to be slotted at the 3rd or 4th year level. In addition, coming straight from a law firm puts you at an added disadvantage compared to other candidates with in-house experience. Given their druthers, employers prefer candidates with in house experience as opposed to those coming straight from law firms.
If you want to move to another law firm, there may be opportunities depending on the demand at a particular snapshot in time. Your ability to move to another firm now will depend on the market conditions, your practice, your credentials, your grades and the quality of your present firm. In the current legal market, the need for junior associates is moderate depending on what part of the country you reside.
Given all these circumstances, it would ideally be best for you to stay put for at least another year. But if you have hit your wall and simply can't bear it anymore, start developing a strategy that will provide a course for the future.
You're very early in your career to walk the path of disillusionment (although I know you are not alone). So in order to make the wisest career choices and avoid falling into a checkered work history, I encourage you to go beyond your misery and dissect the following:
- What makes you so unhappy in your current position?
- What are the things you like about your job?
- What is it about the work that you like? Don't like?
- Which lawyers in your current firm do you like to work with? Why?
- What skills are your strengths? Weaknesses?
- What does the "perfect" job look like to you?
- What do you need to be happy and fulfilled in your career?
The important thing in this exercise is to be as specific as possible. And use these answers to help crystallize the profile of your next role and employer. If you don't know who you are, what you want or what you need, you will not develop the right compass to navigate your career and achieve professional happiness.
Once you have clarity, try to be proactive in your current situation to get what you need—or as much of it as possible. Even if you are on the market, it will take time to find another position so why not try and make lemonade out of lemons while you are still in your current role? You have much to gain by doing so.
At the end of the day, we are all responsible for our own careers and professional happiness—regardless of seniority. Nobody else will shoulder that task for us. And no matter what kind of unhappy career situation we find ourselves in, there is always a way out with a positive attitude, good strategy and execution. The beginning of your journey has started out a little bumpy but by getting your plan set now, you can quickly place yourself on a course of smoother sailing.
Julie Q. Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
Lingering Questions at Supreme Court About Climate Change Litigation Need Resolution
6 minute read'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
Trending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250