Alameda Judge Admonished Over Language and 'Hitting' Lawyer's Hand
The commission's decision does not explain why Judge Morris Jacobson hit the public defender's hand in the act of apologizing at the bench following a sharp exchange.
December 19, 2019 at 04:20 PM
4 minute read
Updated at 5:12 p.m.
A state judicial disciplinary panel on Thursday admonished an Alameda County judge for hitting an attorney's hand in a 2011 incident with enough "inadvertent" force to leave a mark.
Superior Court Judge Morris Jacobson was also chastised by the Commission on Judicial Performance for using "crude and inappropriate" language with a court administrator in 2016 to describe the alleged sexual misconduct of a Texas judge.
"No attorney should fear being hit by the judge, whose duty it is to maintain a courtroom free of such conduct by any of the participants," the commission wrote in its decision, released Thursday. "Judges have at their disposal many tools for carrying out their judicial duties; hitting an attorney's hand is unequivocally not among them."
Jacobson and his attorney, Edith Matthai of Robie & Matthai, said in a statement that the judge agreed to the language in the stipulation.
"As his counsel, I was surprised by the commission's order, which elevates the incident to an intentional assault," Matthai said. "Neither Judge Jacobson nor I believe it is appropriate to assault anyone. As his counsel I can say that the stipulated language was not intended to convey that there was an assault."
Asked why the Commission on Judicial Performance is now disciplining Jacobson for events that occurred eight and almost four years ago, Gregory Dresser, the commission's director and chief counsel, said that "speaking generally, the commission sometimes receives reports of misconduct years after the misconduct occurred."
Jacobson, appointed to the bench by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2005, was previously disciplined twice by the commission.
In 2012 he was publicly admonished for forcing an attorney he was unhappy with to remain in his courtroom for an hour and a half. In 2010 he received an advisory letter after he ordered an attorney to his courtroom, chastised him for a perceived ex parte communication, told him to stay in the courtroom while another attorney was called, and then conducted an uncalendared hearing.
In the new disciplinary matter, the commission said that after a sharp exchange with a public defender during a 2011 arraignment, Jacobson called the attorney to his bench to apologize. She placed her hand on the bench and the judge then "hit her hand, and inadvertently used enough force to leave a visible impression."
The commission's decision does not explain why Jacobson hit the public defender's hand in the act of apologizing.
In 2016, while Jacobson was serving as presiding judge, the commission said he used "crude and inappropriate" language with a court administrator to describe the case of a Texas judge charged with coercing women probationers into having sex with him in exchange for leniency in court.
"The commission notes that, while judges can, and sometimes must, discuss sensitive case-related facts with court personnel, it is improper to use crude and inappropriate language when doing so," the commission wrote. "In this instance, Judge Jacobson's conversation with the court administrator did not pertain to a case before him. Judge Jacobson's use of crude and inappropriate language constituted, at a minimum, improper action."
Jacobson stipulated to the allegations and consented to the public admonishment in documents signed Dec. 10.
Nine commissioners voted to publicly admonish the judge. Commissioners Anthony Capozzi and Sarah Kruer Jager voted to reject the stipulation because it did not contain the specific "crude and inappropriate" language Jacobson used with the court administrator.
This report was updated to include comment from the judge's lawyer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Lookback Window' Law for Child Abuse Cases Constitutional, State High Court Finds
- 2Troutman Pepper Says Ex-Associate Who Alleged Racial Discrimination Lost Job Because of Failure to Improve
- 3Texas Bankruptcy Judge Withdraws Ethics Complaint Against Jackson Walker
- 4Apply Now: Superior Court Judge Sought for Mountain Judicial Circuit Bench
- 5Harrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Underinsured Driver
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250