Array BioPharma Drops Trade Secret Claims Ahead of Tenth Circuit Ruling
The Pfizer subsidiary argued that the threat of harm, even if years in the future, should be grounds for an injunction. But Fenwick & West partner Jedediah Wakefield had argued for Loxo Oncology that Array was merely speculating.
December 30, 2019 at 07:11 PM
3 minute read
Pfizer-owned Array BioPharma Inc. has dropped claims that an Eli Lilly subsidiary and a handful of its scientists stole trade secrets.
Array dismissed its claims against Loxo Oncology Inc. on Dec. 27, six months after a Colorado judge denied Array a preliminary injunction that would have blocked the scientists from working at Loxo, and six weeks after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit sounded inclined to affirm him.
The resolution concludes, at least for now, a chilly ending to a five-year collaboration between Loxo and Array for the development of targeted cancer drugs. Loxo opened its own lab in the same market as Array in 2017 and hired two of Array's scientists, then added seven more in 2018, just after the collaboration deal expired. Eli Lilly and Co. acquired Loxo in February 2019.
The dismissals also short-circuit an appeal that Array's Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan attorneys said raised an issue of first impression: whether the alleged theft of trade secrets can cause irreparable harm even when technology is years from completion and may never come to fruition. Federal and state trade secret laws "cover the threat of misappropriation," San Francisco Quinn partner Charles Verhoeven argued to the Tenth Circuit Nov. 19.
But the Tenth Circuit judges suggested that, while the scientists may have developed knowledge about certain molecules they worked on while at Array, there was little to no evidence they were actually using it at Loxo. Nor had the scientists signed non-compete agreements. "If I'm the scientist, and I think up this deal for company A, and then I leave and go to company B, do I leave half of my brain with company A?" Judge Paul Kelly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit had asked.
Fenwick & West partner Jedediah Wakefield in San Francisco had argued that Array was conjuring purely speculative harm. That's why U.S. District Judge Philip Brimmer of the District of Colorado had issued "a routine denial of a preliminary injunction where the evidence fell short," Wakefield told the court.
In any event, Array, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc. in July 2019, dismissed its claims against Loxo without prejudice and its claims against the nine scientists with prejudice. Loxo, in turn, dropped its claims for a declaratory judgment that no trade secrets were misappropriated.
Along with Wakefield, Loxo's team included Fenwick partners Robert Counihan, Patrick Premo and Adam Gahtan and associates Jeffrey Ware, Kathryn Easterling and Catherine McCord; plus Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partners Regina Rodriguez and Mary Sooter and associate Matthew Worthington; and senior counsel John-Paul Deol of Dhillon Law Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readWilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readLos Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250