Array BioPharma Drops Trade Secret Claims Ahead of Tenth Circuit Ruling
The Pfizer subsidiary argued that the threat of harm, even if years in the future, should be grounds for an injunction. But Fenwick & West partner Jedediah Wakefield had argued for Loxo Oncology that Array was merely speculating.
December 30, 2019 at 07:11 PM
3 minute read
Pfizer-owned Array BioPharma Inc. has dropped claims that an Eli Lilly subsidiary and a handful of its scientists stole trade secrets.
Array dismissed its claims against Loxo Oncology Inc. on Dec. 27, six months after a Colorado judge denied Array a preliminary injunction that would have blocked the scientists from working at Loxo, and six weeks after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit sounded inclined to affirm him.
The resolution concludes, at least for now, a chilly ending to a five-year collaboration between Loxo and Array for the development of targeted cancer drugs. Loxo opened its own lab in the same market as Array in 2017 and hired two of Array's scientists, then added seven more in 2018, just after the collaboration deal expired. Eli Lilly and Co. acquired Loxo in February 2019.
The dismissals also short-circuit an appeal that Array's Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan attorneys said raised an issue of first impression: whether the alleged theft of trade secrets can cause irreparable harm even when technology is years from completion and may never come to fruition. Federal and state trade secret laws "cover the threat of misappropriation," San Francisco Quinn partner Charles Verhoeven argued to the Tenth Circuit Nov. 19.
But the Tenth Circuit judges suggested that, while the scientists may have developed knowledge about certain molecules they worked on while at Array, there was little to no evidence they were actually using it at Loxo. Nor had the scientists signed non-compete agreements. "If I'm the scientist, and I think up this deal for company A, and then I leave and go to company B, do I leave half of my brain with company A?" Judge Paul Kelly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit had asked.
Fenwick & West partner Jedediah Wakefield in San Francisco had argued that Array was conjuring purely speculative harm. That's why U.S. District Judge Philip Brimmer of the District of Colorado had issued "a routine denial of a preliminary injunction where the evidence fell short," Wakefield told the court.
In any event, Array, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc. in July 2019, dismissed its claims against Loxo without prejudice and its claims against the nine scientists with prejudice. Loxo, in turn, dropped its claims for a declaratory judgment that no trade secrets were misappropriated.
Along with Wakefield, Loxo's team included Fenwick partners Robert Counihan, Patrick Premo and Adam Gahtan and associates Jeffrey Ware, Kathryn Easterling and Catherine McCord; plus Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partners Regina Rodriguez and Mary Sooter and associate Matthew Worthington; and senior counsel John-Paul Deol of Dhillon Law Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250