O'Melveny & Myers offices. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/National Law Journal.O'Melveny Seeks Dismissal of Remaining $54M Legal Malpractice Suit
The law firm, after beating back a trustee's legal malpractice claims, is now seeking to dismiss allegations it fraudulently transferred money from a client just before its bankruptcy.
December 31, 2019 at 02:04 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
After beating back legal malpractice claims, Los Angeles-based O'Melveny & Myers is now looking to dismiss the rest of a $54 million lawsuit brought by a bankruptcy trustee.
The law firm on Monday petitioned a California federal judge to dismiss the remaining claims of trustee Jeffrey Golden, who has alleged the firm fraudulently transferred millions of dollars out of client Aletheia Research and Management for legal fees just before it filed Chapter 7 liquidation papers.
In a 33-page motion for summary judgment, lawyers representing the law firm argued that Golden's bankruptcy-related fraudulent transfer claims against O'Melveny and two of its lawyers, Steven Olson and Jorge deNeve, should be dismissed in part because his legal malpractice claims were already rejected by U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder of the Central District of California.
Snyder is set to hear arguments over O'Melveny's summary judgment motion on March 30.
Snyder in November approved an arbitration award that absolved O'Melveny of claims that it bungled its representation of Aletheia Research and Management.
Neither the arbitration award nor Snyder's ruling touched the fraudulent transfer allegations and other bankruptcy-related claims filed by Golden, a partner at Weiland Golden Goodrich serving as Aletheia's Chapter 7 trustee.
Golden claimed O'Melveny and its lawyers were conflicted in their representation of both Aletheia and its principal founder and majority shareholder, Peter Eichler. Golden accused Eichler of looting his own company as Aletheia stared down a lawsuit from Proctor Investment Managers.
O'Melveny represented Aletheia for part of its fight with Proctor; it withdrew from representing Aletheia, and another firm took over in early 2012 after multiple attempts to settle the litigation.
Golden alleges that from 2009 to 2011, O'Melveny and its lawyers fraudulently transferred at least $9.7 million out of Aletheia for legal fees. Aletheia filed for bankruptcy in 2012.
In its motion for summary judgment, O'Melveny said Golden's fraudulent transfer claims must fail because an arbitrator found "there was no conflict of interest and no malpractice" on its part.
Golden also accused O'Melveny of using its "insider" influence with Aletheia to persuade Aletheia's insurance carrier to make two payments to O'Melveny totaling $38,000 in the fall of 2012. O'Melveny argued in its summary judgment motion that Golden cannot prove the law firm met the statutory or non-statutory definition of an insider at the time.
Golden is expected to respond to O'Melveny's motion by Feb. 3. His appeal of Snyder's approval of the arbitration award is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Snyder rejected Golden's arguments that arbitrator Gary Feess was biased because Feess allegedly blamed Golden for his son's failure to secure summer associate positions at both O'Melveny and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, the firm representing O'Melveny and its lawyers in the malpractice dispute.
O'Melveny's attorneys at Gibson Dunn and Golden's lawyers at the law firm Brutzkus Gubner did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
|Read More
O'Melveny Duels With Bankrupt Ex-Client in $54M Malpractice Fight
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute read
Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
6 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
