'Failure to Take Responsibility': Special Masters' Report Assails Appellate Judge Jeffrey Johnson
The findings will be forwarded to the 11 members of the Commission on Judicial Performance, who will decide what punishment, if any, should be handed out. A lawyer for Johnson said the judge disagrees with many of the findings and "we will be filing a brief providing additional insight to these remaining findings which we believe will be very useful to the commission."
January 03, 2020 at 07:21 PM
5 minute read
Attorneys for the Commission on Judicial Performance met "the high burden" of proving most of the 10 counts of misconduct—including groping and sexual harassing co-workers—leveled against Los Angeles appellate court Justice Jeffrey Johnson, a panel of special masters concluded in a report filed Friday.
The 316-page report said the proven allegations, detailed by more than 100 witnesses over 17 days of testimony last year, revealed "ethical lapses" by the justice "that undermine the public's trust in the judicial process and erodes the confidence we ask the public to place in our individual judges."
"These lapses are compounded by Justice Johnson's failure to take responsibility for many of his actions and to manifest insight into his behavior," according to the report, submitted by Justice Judith Haller of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Louis Hanoian and Imperial County Superior Court Judge William Lehman.
"We find particularly concerning Justice Johnson's actions towards women who had recently graduated from law school; were in the early stages of their legal careers; and welcomed the opportunity to establish professional contacts with a Court of Appeal justice," the special masters continued.
The findings will be forwarded to the 11 members of the Commission on Judicial Performance, who will decide what punishment, if any, Johnson receives. A lawyer for Johnson said he contests many of the report's findings.
"We appreciate the hard work of the Special Masters, and their report indicating that the serious claims of the CHP officer were not found to be true," Johnson's attorney, Paul Meyer, said in an email Friday. "We also appreciate the consideration given to Justice Johnson's excellent career and community service. While we disagree with a number of the other findings, we will be filing a brief providing additional insight to these remaining findings which we believe will be very useful to the commission."
The report cites testimony and documents detailing allegations of misconduct by Johnson against fellow jurists on the Second District Court of Appeal, research attorneys, security officers and other court employees in encounters stretching back 20 years. One of the women was Justice Victoria Chaney, who said Johnson inappropriately touched her breasts on multiple occasions and made sexual overtures during a conference in Reno, Nevada.
Other women were subjected to unwanted touching by Johnson and comments from him about their physical appearances and sex lives, the special masters said.
The report concluded that the commission's examiners did not prove allegations that Johnson used sexually suggestive language with or inappropriately touched members of Johnson's security detail, California Highway Patrol Officers Tatiana Sauquillo and Shawna Davison. The special masters did conclude he made inappropriate comments about Sauquillo's appearance and that he told Saquillo that Chaney and Justice Frances Rothschild were "nasty ass bitches."
The report also found credible testimony that Johnson appeared intoxicated at night at the courthouse and at several social events. Johnson and his attorneys had argued that his slurred speech and unsteady gait were due to diabetes, not drunkenness.
Johnson testified he was never drunk at the courthouse, and he suggested that some of the women's testimony was shaped by rumors in the workplace and stereotypes about African American men.
The panel acknowledged that Johnson cooperated with the ethics investigation and that he has "maintained an appropriate attitude toward the inquiry." But the panel questioned Johnson's assertion that he has accepted responsibility for his conduct. The report said Johnson "has attempted to shift blame" to victims.
"With respect to his willingness to reform, we accept that Justice Johnson would very much like to remain on the court and that he is willing to make changes," the special masters said. "We also accept that he has benefitted from his therapy sessions and has the discipline to alter certain aspects of his behavior. But until he shows he has gained insight into, and accepted responsibility for, his more egregious misconduct (which often occurred when he was under the influence of alcohol), we have serious reservations about his ability to reform."
Read the special master's report:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoalition of AGs Support Updates to ABA's Legal Education Diversity Standard
3 minute readCalifornia Supreme Court Rejects State Bar's Initial Plan for New Bar Exam
4 minute readGovernor Signs Legislation Raising Lawyers' Licensing Fees by $88 in 2025
3 minute readCalifornia Bar Wants to Offer Exam Score Boosts, Payments to Sample Test Guinea Pigs
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250