Coppertone Makers Hit With Class Action Over 'Mineral-Based' Sunscreen Label
The suit against Bayer Healthcare and skincare company Beiersdorf claims that Coppertone products promoted as mineral-based in some instances have a larger percentage of chemical active ingredients than mineral active ingredients.
January 06, 2020 at 02:46 PM
2 minute read
The companies behind the Coppertone line of sunscreens have been hit with a lawsuit claiming they misled consumers into buying products labeled as mineral-based that actually contained a significant proportion of chemical active ingredients.
The lawsuit filed Jan. 3 in federal court in the Northern District of California claims that consumers were misled to pay more for the "mineral-based" products amid growing concern about the potential adverse health effects of chemical-based sunscreens, whose active ingredients can penetrate the skin and enter the bloodstream.
The suit claims that the defendants, including Bayer HealthCare, skincare company Beiersdorf and parent companies and subsidiaries affiliated with the two companies, made "a calculated business decision to put profits over people" in how they marketed Coppertone WaterBabies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Stick; Coppertone WaterBabies Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion; Coppertone Kids Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion; and Coppertone Sport Face Mineral-Based Sunscreen Lotion.
"Defendants have done so at the expense of unwitting consumers—many of whom seek to protect their babies and children—and defendants' lawfully acting competitors, over whom defendants have an unfair competitive advantage," wrote the plaintiffs lawyers at Los Angeles' Clarkson Law Firm and Palo Alto's Moon Law.
The lawsuit brings claims under the state's unfair competition law, false advertising law, and consumer remedies act on behalf of a proposed class of California consumers who've purchased the products over the past four years. The suit also seeks to certify a nationwide class and California subclass to pursue claims that the companies breached an express warranty to provide a mineral-based product and to pursue claims of unjust enrichment. The suit also seeks an injunction barring further promotion of the Coppertone products as "mineral-based."
A representative from Beiersdorf said Monday the company cannot comment on pending litigation. A from Bayer Healthcare didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Shireen Clarkson of the Clarkson Law Firm wasn't immediately available for comment Monday.
In September 2019, Bayer AG sold the Coppertone brand, including the accused products, for $550 million to Beiersdorf AG.
Read more:
Diet Dr Pepper Doesn't Mislead Consumers, Appeals Court Says
In Kona Beer Settlement, Prison Inmates Demand to Be Included in Class (Hey, It's a Free $10)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Bonta, Environmental Groups Sue Exxon Mobil Over Plastic Recycling Claims
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250