Snell & Wilmer Gobbles Up West Coast Finance Boutique
A combination with eight-lawyer Assayag Mauss gives Snell & Wilmer a larger presence in Southern California and two new offices in the Pacific Northwest.
January 06, 2020 at 12:35 PM
4 minute read
Phoenix-headquartered Am Law 200 firm Snell & Wilmer is helping to kick off the 2020 law firm merger season, announcing a combination with eight-lawyer commercial finance boutique Assayag Mauss.
"We began discussions last February with this group," Matthew Feeney, chair of Snell & Wilmer, said in an interview. "We came to a meeting of the minds in October. This is a very good boutique firm that was courted a lot. I think we came to respect each other during the process."
Snell & Wilmer, with about 450 attorneys spread over a dozen offices in the U.S. and Mexico until now, will now have 14 offices, including a larger Orange County, California, location and new outposts in Oregon and Washington.
"We look forward to a seamless integration with Assayag Mauss as we deepen our commercial finance bench and explore opportunities in the Pacific Northwest," Feeney said in a statement. "We have always believed in careful, strategic growth and that relationship-based law firms, those that sincerely care about their clients and their concerns, are in the best position to achieve long-term success."
Feeney said the deal with Assayag Mauss was less about geographic location and more about practice area expertise.
"We think commercial finance is a good area to bulk up at this point," Feeney said. "No one knows when the economy will turn, but when it does, that practice area is one you want to be solid on."
"We were looking to expand our corporate litigation and financial practice in California, and we were introduced to Michele and Byron," Ketan Vakil, managing partner of Snell & Wilmer's Orange County office, said in an interview. "And we thought their personalities were a great fit."
Assayag Mauss, an eight-lawyer firm founded in 1996 by Michele Assayag and Byron Mauss, counts six attorneys in its Irvine, California, office and two working out of the Portland and Seattle metro areas, respectively.
Assayag and Mauss met at Paul Hastings in 1994 before setting out on their own two years later. The pair, who will work out of Snell & Wilmer's Orange County office moving forward, were the only two partners in the firm, with the other six all being associates.
All will keep their previous titles after the acquisition.
The deal extends a surge of law firm merger activity that's been building since mid-2019—especially involving at least one small or midsize merger partner.
Eleven of the 29 mergers announced or reported in the last quarter of the year involved one firm with fewer than 10 attorneys and the other more than 100, according to Altman Weil's Mergerline.
There were 115 total mergers announced or reported in 2019—eight more than in any other year since data was made available by Altman Weil in 2007.
Industry analysts have said that due to the number of mergers and the desire of larger firms to penetrate relatively smaller legal markets like Seattle and Portland, the number of potential "right fit" partners is shrinking.
Snell & Wilmer reported modest financial growth in 2018, with revenue moving from $260 million in 2017 to $262 million in 2018. The firm also reported an increase in equity partner profits of 7.5%, growing from $800,000 in 2017 to $860,000 in 2018.
Feeney said the firm does not have any current plans to expand eastward and enjoys its status as a "national firm located in the West".
"The attorneys and staff of Assayag Mauss in California, Oregon and Washington are delighted to join the law firm of Snell & Wilmer, effective as of January 3, 2020," Michele Assayag said in an email. "Through this merger, Assayag Mauss will continue its commercial finance, bankruptcy and creditors' rights practices while providing greater geographical reach and offering a broader array of substantive practice areas to its financial institution and Fortune 500 client base."
|Read More
Despite Uncertainty at the Border, US Firms With Mexico Offices Remain Committed
Snell & Wilmer Reports Increase in Revenue, Profits
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250