Judiciary Poised to Receive $2B in Courthouse Upgrades Under California Budget
The governor's $222.2 billion proposed budget includes money for a court navigator program for unrepresented litigants in state courts, a program Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye initially called for in her 2018 State of the Judiciary Address.
January 10, 2020 at 05:57 PM
3 minute read
California's state judiciary stands to continue receiving incremental funding increases under the budget proposal unveiled Friday by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The governor's $222.2 billion proposed budget includes $4.3 billion for the judicial branch with more money designated for technology projects and long-term priorities flagged by court officials, including a portion of the courthouse construction projects identified by the Judicial Council and a court navigator program for unrepresented litigants in state courts, a program Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye initially called for in her 2018 State of the Judiciary Address.
The program, which is set to get $8.1 million in 2020-21 and $15.5 million annually thereafter, would add court navigators at trial courts to help unrepresented individuals, including victims, witnesses, and family court petitioners, navigate the complexities of the court system.
"We are grateful for Governor Newsom's budget proposal. It is welcome news for our residents, who rely on a fair, just, and accessible court system," the chief justice said in a statement that specifically noted the budget's inclusion of the court navigator program. "This kind of program will assist millions of our court users in understanding and following court processes," she said.
The budget includes $2 billion for court construction projects, which assumes that about five projects from the list of 80 projects identified and ranked by the Judicial Council will be started each year for the next five years. The Judicial Council ranked the projects, which include both new construction and renovation projects in 41 of the state's 58 trial courts, based on need and cost. The administration said it expects to propose the first of the projects this spring. The total cost of all 80 projects is estimated at $13.2 billion.
The budget also includes $10.3 million in 2020-21 and $2.8 million going forward for information technology modernization projects to convert static court forms into an electronic data-driven format; to develop a virtual case management system to allow interfacing between individual court case management systems; and to create "next-generation data centers and cloud-based solutions."
The budget also provides for an expansion of a program that ties fines and court fees to the ability to pay. Four courts have implemented a pilot program to cut fines and fees for those eligible by about 50% and allow them to make payments in installments. The budget includes $11.5 million in 2020-21, increasing to $56 million by 2023-24, to expand the program statewide for both traffic and nontraffic violations. The ongoing $56 million in costs include $2 million to put an online application system in place for the program and $54 million to backfill the estimated loss in revenue to the courts from the lowered fees and fines.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 2Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 3Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 4Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 5Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250