Arizona Court Tosses Girardi's Early Bid to Dismiss Litigation Funder's Suit
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan found that Girardi's out-of-state lawyers hadn't obtained pro hac vice status in the case before filing the motion to dismiss and his local counsel hadn't filed the appropriate notice to appear in the case.
January 13, 2020 at 07:39 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Phoenix has denied an early attempt by Thomas Girardi to knock out a lawsuit brought by litigation funder Stillwell Madison, which sued Girardi, his firm and his wife last year claiming the prominent plaintiffs misled the funder to grant a forbearance of $3,454,804 on a loan of more than $5 million to Girardi's law firm last year.
Stillwell Madison filed suit with counsel from DLA Piper last year claiming that Girardi failed to disclose that he and the firm had defaulted on a loan from a separate lender at the time of the forbearance. Girardi's lawyers asked to dismiss the case calling it a "publicity stunt" aimed at capitalizing on media attention surrounding his wife Erika Jayne's role on the reality television show "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills." They also claimed the dispute was subject to arbitration.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan of the District of Arizona on Monday denied without prejudice a motion to dismiss filed by Girardi's lawyers on technical grounds. Logan found that Girardi's initial lawyers on the motion to dismiss—Phillip A. Baker and Robert C. Baker at the Los Angeles law firm Baker, Keener & Nahra—hadn't applied for pro hac vice status at the time they filed the motion. Logan also found that Phoenix lawyer Patrick McGroder III of Beus Gilbert McGroder, who had also made filings on Girardi's behalf, wasn't authorized to appear in the case.
After Stillwell Madison's lawyers at DLA Piper last year raised the pro hac vice deficiency in reply to Girardi's motion to dismiss, McGroder responded in court papers on Girardi's behalf noting that Robert Baker had been admitted pro hac vice with the Arizona court in prior cases and "in good faith believed he was still admitted by reviewing the court website as to attorneys admitted before this court." McGroder offered to refile Girardi's motion while Baker's pro hac vice status was pending, if the court desired.
In Monday's ruling, Logan noted that McGroder hadn't signed the initial motion to dismiss filed by the California lawyers and "has not otherwise appeared on behalf of defendants in this case." Logan also noted that Robert Baker has not been admitted to appear in the case despite assurances in McGroder's court filing that he would reapply.
"The court finds that neither Robert C. Baker, nor Mr. McGroder have authorization to appear in this case," Logan wrote. "Consequently, the court will not consider the motion on its merits at this time."
Neither Girardi nor any of the lawyers who have appeared in the case on his behalf responded immediately to messages Monday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readSouthern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250