Justice Chin's Retirement Gives Newsom Chance to Shape Supreme Court
"I have absolute confidence in the governor and Marty Jenkins," Justice Ming Chin said in an interview with The Recorder. "They are more than capable."
January 15, 2020 at 07:47 PM
6 minute read
As Gov. Gavin Newsom gears up to make an appointment to the California Supreme Court, one person won't be offering him any guidance: Justice Ming Chin.
Chin, the 24-year associate justice who announced his retirement Wednesday, said in an interview that he has no advice for Newsom or the governor's judicial appointments secretary, Martin Jenkins, on what qualities to look for in his successor.
"I have absolute confidence in the governor and Marty Jenkins," Chin said. "They are more than capable."
Chin, 77, may be one of the few people not sharing his thoughts with the governor's office. With his first nomination to the high court, Newsom has the opportunity to bolster a left-of-center majority while breaking, if he chooses, Gov. Jerry Brown's streak of selecting jurists from outside of California's appellate courts.
No African American male has served on the court since Associate Justice Allen Broussard retired in 1991. No openly LGBT judge has ever been nominated. And Latino groups are eager to see the court reflect a state where Latino residents outnumber whites.
"The Latino Caucus has repeatedly communicated to the governor's office about the need for more diversity in judicial appointments," Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, chair of the legislative Latino Caucus, said in an email. "We are hopeful Governor Newsom will explore diverse candidates, including a possible Latino or Latina, to fill this new vacancy."
Newsom's clues
Newsom issued a statement Wednesday afternoon praising Chin for his "distinguished service."
"As one of the first Asian Americans to take a seat on the highest court in our state, Justice Chin broke barriers," Newsom said. "Serving with distinction on one of the most diverse state supreme courts in the country, Justice Chin has made a lifetime of critical contributions to the legal system."
The governor's press aides did not respond to questions about how the process to replace the justice might work.
Newsom's appointment record to date offers few clues on whom he might choose. The governor, the son of the late state Appellate Justice William Newsom, has only made a handful of appointments to the trial courts and one to an appellate court in his first year in office. He said in May that his administration will look for "diverse" judicial candidates from different racial, ethnic, gender and career backgrounds.
"It's really hard to say" where Newsom may look for a Supreme Court justice, said Horvitz & Levy partner David Ettinger. "Newsom's dad was a court of appeal justice. He definitely had a long background with, and sensitivity to, appellate court work. He could be looking to" two justices on the First District Court of Appeal, Jim Humes and Therese Stewart, Ettinger said.
Another possible contender is Jenkins, a former federal judge and justice on the state's First District.
Whoever the candidates might be, Chin has given the governor plenty of time to ponder. He won't leave until Aug. 31, the end of the current court term.
Chin said his work as a judge "has been the privilege of a lifetime" and that he still relishes his job but wanted "to make sure there was plenty of sand left in the hourglass" post-career.
The son of Chinese immigrants who farmed potatoes in Oregon, Chin got his first taste of the law as a boy when he boarded with a judge's family while attending school.
"The judge gave me law books to read," Chin said in an interview last year with Charles Jung of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. "He took me down to court. I got to watch jury trials. He handed me the gun in a murder case … It was amazing to me that people would come into a courtroom to settle their differences rather than gunfights on the streets or brawls that families got involved in. That was what really attracted me to the law."
"Certainly Not a Knee-jerk Vote"
Colleagues recognized Chin for his warmth and collegiality and even noted that he started the practice of quietly distributing small snacks on the bench during oral arguments.
"We've got to take care of our health," he said jokingly.
Chin served as a captain in the Vietnam War and earned the Bronze Star and Army Commendation Medal. He worked in employment litigation and the Alameda County District Attorney's Office before joining the Alameda County bench and later the First District Court of Appeal, where his service overlapped with Newsom's father.
"I think the conventional thought would be that he was a bit more conservative than the other justices on the current court," Ettinger said. "I also think it's important not to pigeonhole him that way."
While Chin has a reputation of favoring prosecutors, he also wrote the unanimous opinion last month in People v. Arredondo, which held that a sex-crime suspect's Sixth Amendment rights were violated when one of his alleged victims was allowed to testify from behind a computer monitor, blocking the defendant's view.
And while he often agreed with arguments favoring federal preemption of state arbitration laws, he also authored an April 2019 opinion allowing San Francisco Giants security guards to litigate their pay dispute without having to go to arbitration.
"He was certainly not a knee-jerk vote," Ettinger said.
Chin, an international speaker on forensic evidence and the law, said he will continue to work on a practice book about scientific evidence. He is also putting together an educational program on genome editing.
Once an avid runner, Chin said he's more of a "power walker" now. He's taken up golf and hits the links with his son, Jason Chin, who he recently swore in as a judge on the Alameda County Superior Court bench—in the same courtroom where he once served.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order
3 minute readChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250