After Name Partner Eskovitz's Exit, Wilkinson Walsh Shortens Name
The firm said Wednesday that former name partner Sean Eskovitz in Los Angeles and founding partner Brant Bishop had decided to leave the firm "independently and for their own reasons."
January 22, 2020 at 07:02 PM
2 minute read
Name partner Sean Eskovitz has left litigation boutique Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz along with fellow firm founding partner Brant Bishop, prompting the firm to shorten its name to Wilkinson Walsh.
The firm in an email statement Wednesday confirmed Eskovitz, based in Los Angeles, and Bishop, based in Washington, D.C., had both decided to leave the firm.
"They each reached their decisions independently and for their own reasons, and we wish them the very best as they move forward," the firm's statement said. In response to a follow-up email, a firm spokesman said that neither departing partner had "immediate next steps" and that both are taking time off with their families before deciding what's next.
Eskovitz didn't immediately respond to a phone message left Wednesday afternoon. His wife, Katherine Eskovitz, a litigator at Roche Cyrulnik Freedman, didn't respond to a message Wednesday.
Sean Eskovitz left Munger, Tolles & Olson in January 2016 to link up with star litigator Beth Wilkinson from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and white-collar criminal defense partner Alexandra Walsh to found the trial-focused firm with additional high-profile hires from Covington & Burling and Kirkland & Ellis, including Bishop.
Theirs are not the first high-profile departure from the firm. Eric Liebeler, a longtime Kirkland & Ellis partner and former head of litigation at Siemens Corp. who served as the firm's first managing partner, left just months after its founding.
Eskovitz and Walsh last year led a trial team that successfully defended Bayer AG in a case where the company faced a $600 million certified consumer class action over claims it made false and misleading representations that One A Day supported heart health, immunity and physical energy. After a week-long trial, a federal jury in San Francisco on Feb. 22 took just an hour to find for the defense across the board.
Patrick Smith and Jenna Greene contributed reporting to this story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Trending Stories
- 1'I've Worked Until 2 in the Morning': Lawyers Brace for Trump Policy
- 2Trial Begins for Man Accused of Killing Ga. Nursing Student Laken Riley
- 3'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
- 4Benworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
- 5Tom Girardi's Lawyers Want Next Month's Sentencing Delayed
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250