Caltech and Quinn Emanuel Score $1.1B Verdict Against Apple, Broadcom
Quinn Emanuel lawyers told jurors that Apple had directed Broadcom to incorporate an error correction technology that infringed three Caltech patents.
January 29, 2020 at 09:25 PM
3 minute read
The California Institute of Technology and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan have won a $1.1 billion patent infringement award against Apple Inc. and Broadcom Corp. over Wi-Fi chip technology.
Jurors in the Los Angeles courtroom of U.S. District Judge George Wu of the Central District of California returned a verdict Wednesday of $838 million against Apple and $270 million against Broadcom over three patents related to error correction technology for Wi-Fi transmissions.
Caltech argued to the jury that Broadcom incorporated the infringing technology into its Wi-Fi chips at Apple's direction and has supplied them to more than 1 billion devices around the world. Apple has argued in court papers that Caltech's real beef is with Broadcom, not with Apple.
Quinn Emanuel's team featured partners James Asperger, Rachael McCracken, Kevin Johnson and Bill Price.
Price told jurors in his opening statement that Caltech professor Robert McEliece developed U.S. Patents 7,116,710, 7,421,032 and 7,916,781 with Ph.D. students Hui Jin and Aamod Khandekar. They were looking for ways to reduce errors in transmissions to satellites and faraway spacecraft. Their solution was a technology called an irregular repeat and accumulate code.
That invention represented "the best combination for speed, distance, reliability with the real-world benefits" of low complexity and battery conservation, Price told the jurors.
Apple and Broadcom were represented by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. Apple had sought to sever its case from Broadcom's last summer, arguing that "Apple is merely an indirect downstream party whose products incorporate the accused chips."
Apple had tried repeatedly to invalidate the patents at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board with only limited success. That took validity mostly off the table in the trial before Wu.
A Caltech spokesperson said the university is pleased with the verdict and grateful for the attention shown by jurors over the two-week trial. "As a nonprofit institution of higher education, Caltech is committed to protecting its intellectual property in furtherance of its mission to expand human knowledge and benefit society through research integrated with education," the spokesperson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Never-Ending Nightmare': Apple Sued for Alleged Failure to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Survivors
'The Hubris of Big Tech': Apple Hit With California Labor Lawsuit for Alleged Free Speech, Privacy Violations
Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
4 minute readMusic Streaming App Platform Musi Sues Apple on Breach-of-Contract Claims
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250