Orrick Invests in Newly Launched 'App Store' for Legal Tech
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe is the third law firm to invest in the Reynen Court platform, after Clifford Chance and Latham & Watkins previously raised $7 million.
January 30, 2020 at 06:18 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
(Story updated Jan. 31 to reflect the release of Reynen Court's platform.)
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has become the latest Big Law firm to invest in Reynen Court, the self-described "app store" for legal tech that formally launched on Friday.
Orrick's investment was made public Thursday, the day before Reynen Court announced its own commercial release, exiting the beta period that was launched last August. In a press release, Reynen Court founder and CEO Andrew Klein said the release came "on schedule and within budget."
"With tremendous support from five beta period participants, we have advanced the platform's functionality and refined our deployment and support services. We are now prepared to commercially launch the members of our consortium as well as additional firms and legal departments," Klein said.
Orrick was one of the five law firms that participated in the beta period.
Representatives for the San Francisco-based law firm and Reynen Court did not disclose the amount Orrick is investing.
"It's less in size than the original investment of Latham or Clifford Chance, but for us, it's still an incredibly meaningful endorsement from Orrick, which has been a fantastic partner for us in the consortium as one of the beta launchees," said Christian Lang, head of strategy at Reynen Court.
Orrick's investment also follows an additional $3 million the platform received earlier this month from Prins H and Ventech, the former of which is controlled by Klein. That money was used to hire more software engineers, Klein told Legaltech News.
Lang compared Reynen Court to the Google Play Store or the Apple App Store, in which law firms will be able to purchase certain software and use them within their own networks. Reynen Court provides a neutral infrastructure for installing, using and managing that software, Lang said.
"A law firm no longer has to keep tabs on 500 apps running in 500 different ways," Lang said. "They can keep tabs on 500 apps with one control panel."
Orrick is part of a consortium of close to 20 law firms that have supported the development of Reynen Court. They meet quarterly and work with the platform in bringing legal tech vendors on board.
"We hear from our clients again and again that the adoption of legal technology is hindered by the resources needed to vet, pilot and contract for a new solution," Wendy Butler Curtis, Orrick's chief innovation officer, said in the release. "The Reynen Court platform simplifies these steps, accelerating our clients' ability to leverage new technology—which is a win for all of us."
The other firms in the consortium include Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; Cravath, Swaine & Moore; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; Covington & Burling; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Linklaters; Ropes & Gray; White & Case; Davis Polk & Wardwell; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett; Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; Debevoise & Plimpton; Slaughter and May; and Weil, Gotshal & Manges.
|Read More
Ramping Up Ahead of Launch, Reynen Court Secures $3 Million Investment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Supreme Court allows investors' class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
3 minute readStock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Linklaters
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Warton & Garrison
- Clifford Chance
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
- Latham & Watkins
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore
- White & Case
Trending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250