Uber and Lyft Spent More Than $1M on State Lobbying in 2019
Uber's tab was by far its largest quarterly spending on advocacy work since the San Francisco-based company registered as a lobbyist employer in California in 2013.
February 03, 2020 at 06:48 PM
3 minute read
Ride-hailing giants Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. spent more than $1 million lobbying California policy-makers during the last three months of 2019, according to the latest disclosures filed with the Secretary of State's office.
Uber's $701,325 bill was by far its largest quarterly spending on advocacy work since the San Francisco-based company registered as a lobbyist employer in California in 2013.
Lyft's $338,617 in advocacy spending dipped from the $446,450 it paid for state lobbying services between July and September as both companies fought unsuccessfully to derail Assembly Bill 5, legislation making it tougher to classify workers as independent contractors, in the final months of the legislative calendar.
The two companies' combined $2.46 million in spending for 2019 puts them in league with traditional lobbying leaders such as utilities Edison International ($3.3 million) and Pacific Gas & Electric ($2.2 million).
Uber's state filings do not show any lobbying efforts directed toward AB 5. Instead, the company focused on two bills, now shelved, aimed at regulating the two companies' rental bikes and scooters. Uber also lobbied the state Public Utilities Commission on issues related to access for disabled riders, and disclosures show advocacy work targeting the Air Resources Board's campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by ride-hailing companies.
Lyft did report lobbying on AB 5 as well as three other bills dealing with consumer privacy. The company also reported talking to the governor's office about wage-and-hour issues, and, like Uber, it lobbied the Public Utilities Commission and the Air Resources Board.
Local contract lobbyists were the biggest beneficiaries of the companies' efforts to sway decision-makers in 2019. Records show that Lyft worked with Strategies 360 Inc.; Rachelle Chong, a former PUC commissioner turned consultant; KP Public Affairs and Mercury Public Affairs.
Uber retained California Advisors and the Weideman Group. The company also reported $185,000 in payments over the year to campaign consulting firm SCRB Strategies and $90,000 to former state Assemblyman Mike Gatto.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers in Big Law Kick Off Fundraising and Organizing for Kamala Harris
5 minute readNew California Assembly Speaker Names Political Law Veteran General Counsel
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1City Bar Presents Thomas E. Dewey Awards to Outstanding NYC Prosecutors
- 2NC Solicitor General Park Withdraws His 4th Circuit Nomination
- 3Trump-Appointed Judge Presides Over NASCAR Antitrust Dispute Under Case Reassignment
- 4CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
- 5FIFA Faces Legal Challenge Over Winning Saudi World Cup Bid
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250