Uber and Lyft Spent More Than $1M on State Lobbying in 2019
Uber's tab was by far its largest quarterly spending on advocacy work since the San Francisco-based company registered as a lobbyist employer in California in 2013.
February 03, 2020 at 06:48 PM
3 minute read
Ride-hailing giants Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. spent more than $1 million lobbying California policy-makers during the last three months of 2019, according to the latest disclosures filed with the Secretary of State's office.
Uber's $701,325 bill was by far its largest quarterly spending on advocacy work since the San Francisco-based company registered as a lobbyist employer in California in 2013.
Lyft's $338,617 in advocacy spending dipped from the $446,450 it paid for state lobbying services between July and September as both companies fought unsuccessfully to derail Assembly Bill 5, legislation making it tougher to classify workers as independent contractors, in the final months of the legislative calendar.
The two companies' combined $2.46 million in spending for 2019 puts them in league with traditional lobbying leaders such as utilities Edison International ($3.3 million) and Pacific Gas & Electric ($2.2 million).
Uber's state filings do not show any lobbying efforts directed toward AB 5. Instead, the company focused on two bills, now shelved, aimed at regulating the two companies' rental bikes and scooters. Uber also lobbied the state Public Utilities Commission on issues related to access for disabled riders, and disclosures show advocacy work targeting the Air Resources Board's campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by ride-hailing companies.
Lyft did report lobbying on AB 5 as well as three other bills dealing with consumer privacy. The company also reported talking to the governor's office about wage-and-hour issues, and, like Uber, it lobbied the Public Utilities Commission and the Air Resources Board.
Local contract lobbyists were the biggest beneficiaries of the companies' efforts to sway decision-makers in 2019. Records show that Lyft worked with Strategies 360 Inc.; Rachelle Chong, a former PUC commissioner turned consultant; KP Public Affairs and Mercury Public Affairs.
Uber retained California Advisors and the Weideman Group. The company also reported $185,000 in payments over the year to campaign consulting firm SCRB Strategies and $90,000 to former state Assemblyman Mike Gatto.
Lyft's spending in California in 2019 surpassed the $930,000 it spent on federal lobbying in Washington, last year, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org. Uber spent almost twice as much on federal lobbying as it did in Sacramento, records show.
Read more:
Will the Trucking Industry Crack the AB5 Code for the Gig Economy?
Sacramento Firm Drafts Ballot Initiative Challenging Landmark Labor Law
After Landmark Worker Rights Bill, a Familiar Foe Takes Aim at Uber
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers in Big Law Kick Off Fundraising and Organizing for Kamala Harris
5 minute readNew California Assembly Speaker Names Political Law Veteran General Counsel
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250