Salesforce Tower in San Francisco. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALMHanna Andersson Customers Sue Salesforce for Data Breach
Customers whose information was sold on the dark web after malware infected retailer Hanna Andersson's Salesforce e-commerce platform will face "a lifetime risk of identity theft," according to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
February 04, 2020 at 03:14 PM
3 minute read
Cloud services provider Salesforce.com has been roped into a class action lawsuit filed in the wake of a data breach at children's clothing boutique Hanna Andersson, which affected an estimated 10,000 California customers.
Lawyers for the affected customers, including John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan, argue that the companies negligently or carelessly exposed personally identifiable information when malware attacked Hanna's e-commerce platform, and Salesforce "failed to detect the breach for almost three months," according to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The lawsuit asserts that the companies did not know about the breach that occurred from Sept. 16 to Nov. 11 until law enforcement found customers' stolen information on the dark web and warned the clothing chain in December. Hanna Andersson notified potential victims in January.
After the breach, Sacramento County resident Bernadette Barnes contends potential plaintiffs now face a "a lifetime risk of identity theft," according to the complaint.
"Hanna's customers' information was sold or is still for sale to criminals," the attorneys wrote. "This means that the breach was successful; unauthorized individuals accessed Hanna's customers' unencrypted, unredacted information, 'including name, shipping address, billing address, payment card number, CVV code, and expiration date,' and possibly more, without alerting Defendants, then offered the 'scraped' information for sale online where the FBI or similar agency ran across it on or about December 5, 2020."
A Salesforce spokesperson said the company does not comment on ongoing litigation, and Hanna Andersson did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
The lawsuit also alleges that Hanna began recruiting for a director of cybersecurity around the same time Salesforce removed the malware from the system, "indicating that the company may not have had an adequate internal security lead that could monitor the website's systems or implement safeguards," the complaint alleges.
Barnes is suing the companies for negligence, declaratory relief and violations under the California Unfair Competition Law.
Plaintiffs attorneys M. Anderson Berry and Leslie Guillon of Arnold Law Firm in Sacramento, California, declined to comment on the case, and Morgan & Morgan's Yachunis did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Amazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Federal Judge Dismisses Digital Privacy Suit Against E-Commerce Company
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
