Hanna Andersson Customers Sue Salesforce for Data Breach
Customers whose information was sold on the dark web after malware infected retailer Hanna Andersson's Salesforce e-commerce platform will face "a lifetime risk of identity theft," according to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
February 04, 2020 at 03:14 PM
3 minute read
Cloud services provider Salesforce.com has been roped into a class action lawsuit filed in the wake of a data breach at children's clothing boutique Hanna Andersson, which affected an estimated 10,000 California customers.
Lawyers for the affected customers, including John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan, argue that the companies negligently or carelessly exposed personally identifiable information when malware attacked Hanna's e-commerce platform, and Salesforce "failed to detect the breach for almost three months," according to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The lawsuit asserts that the companies did not know about the breach that occurred from Sept. 16 to Nov. 11 until law enforcement found customers' stolen information on the dark web and warned the clothing chain in December. Hanna Andersson notified potential victims in January.
After the breach, Sacramento County resident Bernadette Barnes contends potential plaintiffs now face a "a lifetime risk of identity theft," according to the complaint.
"Hanna's customers' information was sold or is still for sale to criminals," the attorneys wrote. "This means that the breach was successful; unauthorized individuals accessed Hanna's customers' unencrypted, unredacted information, 'including name, shipping address, billing address, payment card number, CVV code, and expiration date,' and possibly more, without alerting Defendants, then offered the 'scraped' information for sale online where the FBI or similar agency ran across it on or about December 5, 2020."
A Salesforce spokesperson said the company does not comment on ongoing litigation, and Hanna Andersson did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
The lawsuit also alleges that Hanna began recruiting for a director of cybersecurity around the same time Salesforce removed the malware from the system, "indicating that the company may not have had an adequate internal security lead that could monitor the website's systems or implement safeguards," the complaint alleges.
Barnes is suing the companies for negligence, declaratory relief and violations under the California Unfair Competition Law.
Plaintiffs attorneys M. Anderson Berry and Leslie Guillon of Arnold Law Firm in Sacramento, California, declined to comment on the case, and Morgan & Morgan's Yachunis did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
'Biggest Influencer Scam of All Time'?: PayPal Accused of Poaching Commissions Via Its 'Honey' Browser Extension
Amazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
Trending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250