Appellate Judge Accused of Sexual Misconduct Pleads to Keep His Job
Lawyers for Judge Jeffrey Johnson of the Second District Court of Appeal said they reached out to the commission before any public testimony "to accept discipline short of removal for those violations which were true, and for which he was then undergoing counseling and education."
February 05, 2020 at 06:59 PM
4 minute read
Updated Feb. 6
Ousting Jeffrey Johnson from the Second District Court of Appeal for allegedly groping and sexually harassing co-workers would break precedent and harm a respected jurist "who has already been punished far beyond any other judicial officer," attorneys for the embattled appeals judge told the Commission on Judicial Performance on Wednesday.
Johnson's attorneys pleaded with commissioners, set to hear oral arguments in the disciplinary case next month, to "take a fresh look at the matter" and to allow him to continue serving on the appellate court.
"There is still time to step back from the precipice of this potential grave injustice," the lawyers said in their 112-page opening brief. The lawyers continued: "Justice Johnson deserves the opportunity, as the commission has given others, to prove that reformation and redemption are part of the system of justice in this administration. He stands humbly before you—still trusting that there will be a just and honorable end to this process."
Johnson is represented by Paul Meyer of Paul S. Meyer APC, Reg Vitek of Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, Thomas Warwick Jr. of Grimes & Warwick and Willie Brown, the former mayor of San Francisco.
Johnson's brief was filed one month after a three-judge panel of special masters concluded in a 316-page report that prosecutors for the Commission on Judicial Performance had proven most of the elements within 10 counts of misconduct, which included allegations that Johnson improperly touched and sexually harassed numerous women and appeared intoxicated at several public events.
The justice's "ethical lapses" were "compounded by Justice Johnson's failure to take responsibility for many of his actions and to manifest insight into his behavior," according to the report, submitted by Justice Judith Haller of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Louis Hanoian and Imperial County Superior Court Judge William Lehman.
Johnson said in the brief that he was never told his behavior was unwelcome.
"Although the masters credit his willingness to reform and good faith actions, the absence of notice of any problem denied him the chance to respond if so informed," his attorneys told the commissioners.
Johnson's attorneys also accused prosecutors of "piling on" less serious allegations, including intoxication and poor demeanor, "to bolster a private non-judicial conduct matter." Johnson has argued that his diabetes-related low blood sugar has caused symptoms that can mimic drunkenness. Accusations about his demeanor do not amount to "egregious" behavior, the lawyers wrote.
The judge's lawyers contend the special masters gave too much weight to allegations by Justice Victoria Chaney that Johnson had inappropriately touched her breasts and made unwelcome comments about her appearance in numerous instances stretching back to 2009.
The brief said Johnson reached out to the commission "long before" 17 days of public testimony was heard in the case last year "to accept discipline short of removal for those violations which were true, and for which he was then undergoing counseling and education."
The justice has continued working and has accommodated "restrictions" on his work in the courthouse, the attorneys wrote. "He cooperated fully with the investigation and with all proceedings," they said. "Cooperation does not require confession to untrue claims."
Justice Jeffrey Johnson's brief to the commission is posted below:
||
Read more:
'Failure to Take Responsibility': Report Assails Judge Jeffrey Johnson
Correction: An earlier version of this report misidentified Justice Jeffrey Johnson's court. He serves on the Second District Court of Appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250