A California appellate court found that a reasonable person would not jump to the same conclusions as a plaintiff who alleged a tangerine juice-maker fraudulently branded its product as “No Sugar Added,” implying that all other competing juices do contain added sugar and are less healthy.

California’s Second District Court of Appeal Thursday affirmed the dismissal of the case against plant-based food producer Califia Farms, defended by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton’s Sascha Henry in Los Angeles.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]