Google Hit With Class Action Under Illinois Biometric Privacy Law Over Facial Recognition
The complaint claims Google "failed to obtain consent from anyone" when it introduced facial recognition to its cloud service for storing and sharing photos. The lawsuit comes in the wake of the announcement of a proposed $550 million settlement that Facebook Inc. reached in a BIPA class action.
February 07, 2020 at 12:32 PM
3 minute read
Google Photos App (Photo: Shutterstock.com)
Google LLC has been hit with a class action lawsuit claiming that its Google Photos service uses facial recognition technology that violates an Illinois biometric privacy law that carries stiff statutory penalties.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that Google has failed to get the consent or written release required under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, a 2008 law that requires companies that collect and store state residents' unique identifiers such as fingerprints, iris scans, DNA and face geometry to provide details on how they store and protect the sensitive information. The statute carries statutory damages of $1,000 for negligent violations and $5,000 for violations found to be intentional or reckless.
Lawyers at Ahdoot & Wolfson in Los Angeles and Carey Rodriguez Milian Gonya in Miami claim that Google "failed to obtain consent from anyone" when it introduced facial recognition to Google Photos, its cloud service for storing and sharing photos. They're seeking to certify a class of individuals from whom Google obtained biometric identifiers via photographs uploaded in Illinois.
"Google's proprietary facial recognition technology scans each and every photo uploaded to the cloud-based Google Photos for faces, extracts geometric data relating to the unique points and contours (i.e., biometric identifiers) of each face, and then uses that data to create and store a template of each face—all without ever informing anyone of this practice," they write. They also claim that Google holds several patents for facial recognition that detail how the company scans photos for facial identifiers and creates face templates "without obtaining informed written consent."
Representatives for Google didn't immediately respond to request for comment Friday morning.
Tina Wolfson of Ahdoot & Wolfson, likewise, did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
The Google lawsuit comes in the wake of the announcement of a proposed $550 million settlement that Facebook Inc. reached in lawsuits bringing claims under BIPA. The Facebook deal, which has yet to be filed in court, is still subject to approval from U.S. District Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California. Donato at a hearing Thursday asked lawyers in that case to provide detailed explanations of why the deal would pay class members less than statutory damages amounts.
Read the complaint:
Read more:
Judge Overseeing $550M Facebook 'Tag Suggestions' Settlement Wants Details on Individual Payouts
Facebook Agrees to $550M Deal to Settle Biometric Suit Over 'Tag Suggestions'
Facebook's Facial Recognition Could Violate 'Privacy Interests,' Appeals Court Rules
Bumpy Ride for Six Flags: Biometrics Tactics Ruled Illegal in Illinois
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
California Walnut Grower and German Investment Firm Vie for Lead Plaintiff Status in Super Micro Securities Action
Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
