'Uncharted Waters': Fresno Judge Sets 'Emergency Procedures' as Resources Squeezed
"The emergency procedures announced above are being implemented reluctantly. They are not, in the undersigned's view, conducive to the fair administration of justice," U.S. District Judge Dale Drozd said in a pair of standing orders.
February 07, 2020 at 07:10 PM
4 minute read
Citing a "judicial emergency," a federal trial judge in Fresno said he will stop scheduling new civil trials as he tries to juggle two criminal dockets.
U.S. District Judge Dale Drozd of the Eastern District of California also announced in two standing orders issued Feb. 6 that he will no longer be able to hear oral arguments in all civil motions. Additionally, civil trials already scheduled through 2021 are unlikely to proceed on time, he said.
"These are uncharted waters for this court," Drozd wrote in the orders. "The emergency procedures announced above are being implemented reluctantly. They are not, in the undersigned's view, conducive to the fair administration of justice. However, the court has been placed in an untenable position in which it simply has no choice."
The Feb. 2 retirement of Judge Lawrence O'Neill left Drozd as the only non-senior district judge in the Fresno courthouse. Drozd said his focus has shifted to handling his own criminal calendar and the one once shepherded by O'Neill. Drozd's criminal standing order warns attorneys that he may find himself "juggling several cases with overlapping trial schedules and posing different Speedy Trial Act considerations."
"He's overwhelmed," said longtime Fresno attorney Anthony Capozzi.
Judges in California's Eastern District have long complained about excessive caseloads and inadequate numbers of bench positions to handle them. The 34-county court, which stretches from the Oregon border down the eastern side of California to Bakersfield, has not been given a new judgeship since 1978. Since then, the region's population has mushroomed from 2.5 million to approximately 8 million.
Until recent retirements, the Eastern District's six judges, aided by 14 magistrates, handled a caseload ranked 10th highest among the nation's 94 districts in 2019, according to federal judicial statistics.
"It has been a long-standing, systemic problem in the Eastern District that we are not adequately staffed with district court judges," said McGregor Scott, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District who served in the office between 2003 and 2009 before returning in 2018 from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
The Sacramento courthouse has also been hit by vacancies. U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr. took senior status in December and underwent surgery, leaving him temporarily unable to work. U.S. District Senior Judge Garland Burrell Jr. assumed inactive senior status Dec. 31.
The Trump administration, with an initial focus on filling circuit court vacancies, has not announced any nominations to the Eastern District. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has vetted two potential candidates for the district court, said a source who was interviewed by the agency. But those names have not been formally introduced.
The Trump administration and California's two Democratic U.S. senators have been at odds over past nominees to courts in the Golden State. While Senate Republicans dropped the traditional "blue-slip" process allowing home-state senators to block nominees for circuit judges, it remains in place for district court candidates.
"Sen. Feinstein understands the critical role of judges in the Eastern District and shares concerns about the current vacancies," said Feinstein aide Adam Russell. "She and Sen. [Kamala] Harris are working to ensure that qualified, mainstream jurists are confirmed to fill those vacancies."
Scott, a Republican, called the need for more judges "a good government issue."
"This is not a partisan issue in any way, shape or form," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElevate Acquires Intellectual Property Research Provider Sagacious IP
3 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
- 2Is Your Law Firm Growing Fast Enough? Scale, Consolidation and Competition
- 3Child Custody: The Dangers of 'Rules of Thumb'
- 4The Spectacle of Rudy Giuliani Returns to the SDNY
- 5Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250