Using AI to Improve the RFP Process: A Q&A With Globality's Mili Desai
"We've all heard of legal tech. That's sort of the buzzword. But in terms of companies that are going to make an impact on a large scale for large companies, it's a smaller subset," Desai said.
February 10, 2020 at 02:03 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
As advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning reshape the legal industry, more companies are leveraging technology to carve out niche spaces in the market.
One such firm, startup Globality Inc., based in Menlo Park, is using an AI-powered platform to make the request for proposal process less of a headache and help connect large companies with service providers throughout the world. The Silicon Valley company has Fortune 500 clients who operate in an array of industries, from finance to pharmaceuticals.
Globality's director of legal services, Mili Desai, joined the company a year ago after serving as a manager of lawyer talent at legal staffing firm Axiom following a stint as a Big Law litigator. The Harvard Law grad spoke with The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel recently about AI, RFPs and data-driven trends in the legal industry.
The conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
Corporate Counsel: We've written about how the RFP process is broken, and one of the main complaints we've heard from in-house counsel is that they can get these lengthy RFP responses that don't say a lot. What do you hear from clients about the RFP process and how they want to see it improve?
Mili Desai: What you identified is definitely a huge pain point for in-house counsel in terms of the process just not working. The responses they're getting are not tailored to their actual problem. Part of that, I think, is an issue with scoping out what the actual need is and part of what our tool does is use AI to help scope out the need. First of all, identifying who in your panel are even the right firms to bid on a project. Are there providers outside of your panel that are better suited to this and aren't just a recommendation of someone that you already know?
CC: Do you see this market becoming more crowded in the next few years?
MD: We've all heard of legal tech. That's sort of the buzzword. But in terms of companies that are going to make an impact on a large scale for large companies, it's a smaller subset. There is a ton of room for process optimization and increasing efficiency in a way that the legal business is run. But in terms of becoming the standard across the industry, that's a smaller subset of the companies that we're seeing emerge.
CC: Let's talk about another trend regarding how roles in law firms are expected to change or form in response to more creative pricing methods.
MD: We've already seen a little bit of this with law firms hiring chief pricing officers or heads of pricing. I think that those are going to become more departmental in large law firms, giving those people a staff that can help respond to client demand, downward price pressure that they're getting from clients. I also think clients are wanting more accountability in terms of where these fees are coming from. What's the justification for the hour estimates that you're giving us for a certain matter? It connects back to the data piece in terms of having a more thoughtful approach and, quite frankly, a defensible approach to fee setting when talking to more sophisticated clients who are facing that price pressure from their own budgets.
CC: Data privacy, compliance, cybersecurity—all big issues and major concerns for companies and their legal department leaders. Talk about trends you see in that realm and how that might be shaping corporate legal departments.
MD: It's no longer enough for GCs to say, "OK, technology and information security is [information technology]'s realm." The legal department needs to get a little bit more involved in establishing policy for incident response and just being more savvy as to what the business is up against when it comes to data privacy and information security.
CC: Is there anything that you'd like to add?
MD: The overriding trend here is we're moving into the future slowly but surely. That change that everyone has been talking about for the past seven or 10 years, we're really on the cusp of it now where I think lawyers are becoming more comfortable embracing technology's role in their everyday life. We can feel a little bit more comfortable in terms of these technologies being reliable and being able to use that to make us more efficient as lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250