Most appellate lawyers know the maxim that notices of appeal are to be liberally construed. Indeed, it is codified in rule 8.100(a)(2) of the California Rules of Court. But how far does that liberal construction stretch?

In a recent opinion, K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School District, the California Supreme Court offered some clarification on this point. Reversing a Court of Appeal’s dismissal of an appeal, the Supreme Court held that under some circumstances, an appeal can proceed on the merits despite the failure of the notice of appeal to identify the correct appellant.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]