Appellate Court Sustains Whistleblower Claim Against SF City Attorney Herrera
In an unpublished opinion, California's First District Court of Appeal said that evidence "amply supports" a jury's finding in 2017 that City Attorney Dennis Herrera sidelined and then fired senior trial attorney Joanne Hoeper for investigating an alleged kickback scheme.
February 14, 2020 at 07:53 PM
4 minute read
A state appellate court has upheld a whistleblower retaliation verdict that awarded $5 million to a former San Francisco deputy city attorney.
In an unpublished opinion, California's First District Court of Appeal said Thursday that evidence "amply supports" a jury's finding in 2017 that City Attorney Dennis Herrera sidelined and then fired senior trial attorney Joanne Hoeper for investigating payments made by the city to replace private sewer systems, a practice she alleged was tied to a kickback scheme.
"The city's brief eloquently argues its view that its evidence on these points was stronger or more credible than Hoeper's, just as it did in arguing this case to the jury," Justice Peter Siggins wrote for a unanimous three-justice panel. "But the jurors rejected those arguments and found the evidence supported Hoeper's claims. … The verdict stands."
The court also declined to reduce the $2.6 million in damages awarded to Hoeper for lost earnings and emotional distress. Additionally, the justices upheld the $2.4 million award for attorney fees.
"This case presents no grounds to disturb the award," Siggins wrote. "The loss of Hoeper's position effectively put an end to her 30-year legal career and 20 years at the" city attorney's office.
"I lost the career I loved protecting the city I love," Hoeper said in a statement distributed by her attorneys at Cannata, O'Toole, Fickes & Olson. "I hope this long-delayed victory encourages other public employees to do the right thing, be true to their oath and report wrongdoing. I hope it sends a strong signal to the city attorney and to other elected officials that, at least in California, firing whistleblowers is illegal and there will be consequences."
Herrera spokesman John Coté said in an email that the the case "was never about corruption, and no court has found or suggested any city corruption in connection with Ms. Hoeper's claims. We believe in the jury system, but no system is perfect. Sometimes juries get it wrong, and that's what happened here. Winning an appeal in an employment case like this is challenging."
Coté said the office is considering its next steps.
The city attorney was represented by deputy city attorneys Jeremy Goldman and Kenneth Walczak and Keker, Van Nest & Peters founding partner John Keker and partner Susan Harriman.
Hoeper alleged that city employees improperly paid plumbing companies $19 million to replace private sewer systems even though they knew there was no legitimate reason for the city to pay for the work.
Hoeper said she launched an investigation into the payments with Herrera's knowledge in 2011 and reported her findings to Herrera in July 2012. The next day, Hoeper alleges the city attorney transferred her to the San Francisco District Attorney's Office. Hoeper says she was fired in November 2013, following Herrera's reelection to a third term, and her last day was Jan. 7.
Herrera said in his response to Hoeper's initial retaliation claim that he had long been dissatisfied with Hoeper's work and had been looking to replace her "long before" she reported her investigation's findings. Herrera called Hoeper's whistleblower retaliation claim "meritless."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPolsinelli Hires Data Privacy, Tech Transactions Partner From Kirkland & Ellis
Many Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readQuantum Computing Company to Part With General Counsel
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250