Latham Supplies Legal Juice to Battery Suppliers
The firm scores IP wins for Shenzhen, China's Senior Technology and Korea's LG Chem against competitors in the fast-growing lithium-ion battery market.
February 20, 2020 at 07:11 PM
4 minute read
The allegations follow a familiar pattern. A Chinese-born scientist worked many years at an American technology company, then returned home, allegedly bringing stolen trade secrets with him.
Celgard v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material, a dispute over lithium-ion battery components, has an additional twist. The American company (now Japanese owned) claims that its former employee even changed his name to throw his former employer off the scent.
"When he joined Senior, Dr. Steven Zhang assumed a pseudo-name in China, Dr. Bin Wang, in his position of CTO of Senior, so that Celgard would not be able to locate him," Celgard contended in a 33-page motion for preliminary injunction filed last fall in the Northern District of California.
Zhang "had access to, and accessed Celgard's trade secrets and confidential information," which helped Senior optimize its battery separators and steal a multimillion-dollar contract from a California-based supplier of electric vehicle batteries, Celgard's attorneys at Robins Kaplan alleged.
Senior's attorneys at Latham & Watkins have hotly contested the allegations. They say Celgard has produced no evidence of misappropriation, and that the design and manufacturing process of its accused separators was finalized before Zhang's arrival. Senior asked Zhang "to introduce himself as Bin Wang" because it knew of Celgard's litigious history. "Senior believed (correctly) that Dr. Zhang's work for Senior would motivate Celgard to target Senior in costly and uncalled-for litigation," they argued in December in an opposition brief signed by Latham partner Kevin Wheeler.
Senior cautioned that a preliminary injunction would "crush Senior's business and collaterally damage some of the world's largest lithium-ion battery manufacturers," plus consumer electronics and electric vehicle companies.
Now, for the time being at least, Senior has short-circuited Celgard's attack. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern District of California has dismissed Celgard's suit on the ground that Celgard failed to show sufficient contacts between Senior and California to establish personal jurisdiction.
"Because Celgard has not met its burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over Senior-China," Tigar wrote, "the court denies Celgard's motion for preliminary injunction with respect to this defendant."
His order, unsealed Wednesday, gave Celgard 21 days to amend its complaint. Along with Wheeler, Latham's team was led by partners Gregory Sobolski, Matthew Walch and Hui Xu.
It's the second win this month for Latham in the fast-growing battery space. On Feb. 14 an International Trade Commission judge granted Korea-based LG Chem's and Latham's motion for a default judgment and sanctions against Korean rival SK Innovation Co. Ltd. LG Chem accused SKI of hiring many dozens of its employees and incorporating LG Chem's trade secrets in its lithium-ion battery products.
Administrative Law Judge Cameron Elliot's order and much of the briefing in the case is under seal. But according to public filings, LG Chem had accused SKI of widespread spoliation of evidence. Just before LG Chem filed its suit, SKI leaders allegedly asked employees to delete any unnecessary documents "such as resumes and documents that may potentially trigger unnecessary misunderstanding." Meeting minutes reflected that the "purpose is to prevent in advance problematic issues should a legal dispute arise with a competitor."
Commission staff had supported LG Chem's motion for a default judgment. SKI argued that it had in fact produced the relevant documents that LG Chem described as deleted, but Eliott apparently wasn't persuaded. SKI, which is represented at the ITC by Covington & Burling, has said it will ask the full ITC to review the order, warning that it could have "an adverse impact on significant investment and jobs tied to the domestic manufacturing plant SKI is building in Georgia," not to mention the U.S. auto industry.
Latham's ITC team was led by partners Bert Reiser, David Callahan, Gabriel Gross and Jeffrey Homrig, along with counsel Joseph Lee and Sarah Gragert.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Bonta, Environmental Groups Sue Exxon Mobil Over Plastic Recycling Claims
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250