Latham Supplies Legal Juice to Battery Suppliers
The firm scores IP wins for Shenzhen, China's Senior Technology and Korea's LG Chem against competitors in the fast-growing lithium-ion battery market.
February 20, 2020 at 07:11 PM
4 minute read
The allegations follow a familiar pattern. A Chinese-born scientist worked many years at an American technology company, then returned home, allegedly bringing stolen trade secrets with him.
Celgard v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material, a dispute over lithium-ion battery components, has an additional twist. The American company (now Japanese owned) claims that its former employee even changed his name to throw his former employer off the scent.
"When he joined Senior, Dr. Steven Zhang assumed a pseudo-name in China, Dr. Bin Wang, in his position of CTO of Senior, so that Celgard would not be able to locate him," Celgard contended in a 33-page motion for preliminary injunction filed last fall in the Northern District of California.
Zhang "had access to, and accessed Celgard's trade secrets and confidential information," which helped Senior optimize its battery separators and steal a multimillion-dollar contract from a California-based supplier of electric vehicle batteries, Celgard's attorneys at Robins Kaplan alleged.
Senior's attorneys at Latham & Watkins have hotly contested the allegations. They say Celgard has produced no evidence of misappropriation, and that the design and manufacturing process of its accused separators was finalized before Zhang's arrival. Senior asked Zhang "to introduce himself as Bin Wang" because it knew of Celgard's litigious history. "Senior believed (correctly) that Dr. Zhang's work for Senior would motivate Celgard to target Senior in costly and uncalled-for litigation," they argued in December in an opposition brief signed by Latham partner Kevin Wheeler.
Senior cautioned that a preliminary injunction would "crush Senior's business and collaterally damage some of the world's largest lithium-ion battery manufacturers," plus consumer electronics and electric vehicle companies.
Now, for the time being at least, Senior has short-circuited Celgard's attack. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern District of California has dismissed Celgard's suit on the ground that Celgard failed to show sufficient contacts between Senior and California to establish personal jurisdiction.
"Because Celgard has not met its burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over Senior-China," Tigar wrote, "the court denies Celgard's motion for preliminary injunction with respect to this defendant."
His order, unsealed Wednesday, gave Celgard 21 days to amend its complaint. Along with Wheeler, Latham's team was led by partners Gregory Sobolski, Matthew Walch and Hui Xu.
It's the second win this month for Latham in the fast-growing battery space. On Feb. 14 an International Trade Commission judge granted Korea-based LG Chem's and Latham's motion for a default judgment and sanctions against Korean rival SK Innovation Co. Ltd. LG Chem accused SKI of hiring many dozens of its employees and incorporating LG Chem's trade secrets in its lithium-ion battery products.
Administrative Law Judge Cameron Elliot's order and much of the briefing in the case is under seal. But according to public filings, LG Chem had accused SKI of widespread spoliation of evidence. Just before LG Chem filed its suit, SKI leaders allegedly asked employees to delete any unnecessary documents "such as resumes and documents that may potentially trigger unnecessary misunderstanding." Meeting minutes reflected that the "purpose is to prevent in advance problematic issues should a legal dispute arise with a competitor."
Commission staff had supported LG Chem's motion for a default judgment. SKI argued that it had in fact produced the relevant documents that LG Chem described as deleted, but Eliott apparently wasn't persuaded. SKI, which is represented at the ITC by Covington & Burling, has said it will ask the full ITC to review the order, warning that it could have "an adverse impact on significant investment and jobs tied to the domestic manufacturing plant SKI is building in Georgia," not to mention the U.S. auto industry.
Latham's ITC team was led by partners Bert Reiser, David Callahan, Gabriel Gross and Jeffrey Homrig, along with counsel Joseph Lee and Sarah Gragert.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHershey's 'Bubble Yum' Hit With Consumer Class Action for Allegedly Containing 'Forever Chemicals'
Los Angeles Secures $35M Settlement From Monsanto in Water Contamination Lawsuit
Bonta, Environmental Groups Sue Exxon Mobil Over Plastic Recycling Claims
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250