Stanford Law Students Among Groups Chiding Judiciary Over Its Handling of Sexual Misconduct
Law students groups from Yale, Stanford and Harvard cited the "slow progress" by the federal judiciary in effectively addressing the problem.
February 24, 2020 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
|
Students from the top three law schools in the country are pushing the federal judiciary to step up its efforts to combat sexual misconduct by judges, saying they are "frustrated by the slow progress" achieved since the problem came to national attention in 2017.
A coalition of law student groups from Harvard, Yale and Stanford sent a letter Feb. 24 to U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts and the chief judges of the country's 13 federal appellate courts that urges the judiciary to bolster its mechanisms for judicial clerks and other court employees to report misconduct, and to adopt a more uniform process to collect data on harassment and make it available to the public and to law schools.
"We write on behalf of law students who believe that the federal judiciary has responded inadequately to widespread misconduct and are concerned that the judiciary is not a safe working environment," the letter reads.
It was signed by the Harvard Women's Law Association; Stanford Law School for Gender Violence Prevention; Women of Stanford Law; Yale Law Women; and the Yale Law School Title IX Working Group. The letter was also endorsed by the People's Parity Project, a student organization that started at Harvard Law but has since established chapters at six top law campuses.
The letter references the testimony of Olivia Warren, a former clerk for the late U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt, who on Feb. 13 testified before a House Judiciary committee that the judge repeatedly harassed her throughout her 2017 clerkship. The movement to confront sexual misconduct by federal judges got underway in 2017, when former Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski retired amid allegations of sexual harassment. But the problem is not limited to those jurist, and the students wrote that the unique relationship between judges and clerks—with a significant imbalance of power—makes clerks particularly vulnerable.
"The unique closeness of a chambers environment, the early career stage of most law clerks, the importance of clerking relationships to future employment, and the opaqueness of available remedies have made law clerks extremely reluctant to report misconduct," the student letter reads.
The letter recommends several key changes by the federal judiciary. Among them:
- The judiciary should establish a uniform set of questions on misconduct for surveys of clerks and court employees, even if circuit courts conduct such surveys independently. Data on judicial misconduct should be available to the public and reported in a standardized way.
- The newly created Office of Judicial Integrity should serve as a centralized reporter of data on misconduct and serve as a place for clerks and court employees to report misconduct, as they may fear retaliation should they report problems to their own circuits.
- Both the Office of Judicial Integrity and the circuits themselves should share information about judicial misconduct with law schools, which serve as conduits for judicial clerks.
"This is not the first step to address misconduct, and it won't be the last," said Yale Law student Anna Kaul, a member of the Yale Law Women, of the student letter. "We will continue to call for transparency and accountability to ensure that judicial employees are afforded the safety and respect that all workers deserve."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Class Action Lawsuit Targets 40 Private Colleges and Universities Over Alleged Price-Fixing
3 minute readJudge Pauses Landmark $2.75B NCAA Settlement Proposal, Parties to Hash Out More Details
6 minute readBerkeley Law Taps Big Tech, Law Firms and ACLU to Design New AI LLM Program
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250