4 Veteran Prosecutors File Gender, Age Discrimination Claims Against Contra Costa DA
Four deputy district attorneys with more than 80 years of combined experience in the office claim that the office has a "long and pervasive culture of systemic gender discrimination" in a newly filed federal lawsuit.
February 27, 2020 at 06:48 PM
3 minute read
Four veteran prosecutors have filed a gender and age discrimination lawsuit against the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office and District Attorney Diana Becton.
Lawyers for Mary Knox, Rachel Piersig, Alison Chandler and Mary Blumberg, all deputy district attorneys in the office, filed a complaint in federal court Wednesday claiming that the office has a "long and pervasive culture of systemic gender discrimination." The lawsuit, which brings state and federal claims of gender and age discrimination as well as retaliation claims, alleges that since Becton took office the women have been passed over for supervisory positions and, in certain instances, have been replaced by male candidates with less experience.
The lawsuit claims that Becton, who became the first woman and African American to serve as district attorney when appointed to the office in 2017 after more than two decades on the Contra County Superior bench, came into office pledging to address issues raised by a group of senior women prosecutors.
"Instead of building on gains made by the women in the office, Becton has reversed progress for women and has engaged in a pattern and course of gender and age discrimination by systematically demoting and failing to advance, promote and assign supervisory roles to qualified and accomplished prosecutors who are women, particularly if those women have significant prosecutorial experience and tenure," wrote the prosecutors' attorneys, Sarah Nichols and Shelley Molineaux, of Nichols Law in San Francisco.
Nichols, in a phone interview Thursday, said that her clients were initially excited about Becton coming aboard as DA, but that now they're suing to make sure that the best-qualified people are in important prosecutorial positions for the county. "I think these are women who are so used to fighting for others and so used to just thinking about the best interest of the county are really just trying to serve the county," she said. The lawsuit seeks lost wages and emotional distress damages, as well as an injunction barring discriminatory practices in the office.
Scott Alonso, a spokesman for the Contra Costa DA's office, said that the office would have no comment since the litigation is pending. The office will be represented by lawyers in the County Counsel's Office.
According to the lawsuit, junior male prosecutors have been "systemically" promoted sooner than their female counterparts, resulting in disparate pay. The complaint claims that male supervisors currently oversee at least 75% of the prosecuting attorneys in the office. The lawsuit also claims that women who have complained about disparate treatment within the office have been reassigned to less desirable posts as a "mental health break."
"This treatment has a disparate impact on female prosecutors, contributing to pauses in their career and a slower rise through the ranks of the DA's office," the complaint says.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250