Zynga Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Data Breach
Tuesday's lawsuit seeks to certify a subclass of young users of the company's social games claiming that the minors aren't bound by contractual terms forced on users upon sign-up.
March 03, 2020 at 05:00 PM
3 minute read
Social game developer Zynga Inc., the company behind popular mobile games including Words with Friends, has been hit with a class action lawsuit stemming from a data breach that reportedly resulted in hundreds of millions of user accounts being hacked.
Lawyers at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy; Foulston Siefkin; and The Miller Law Firm filed suit Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a nationwide class of Zynga account holders whose personally identifiable information was stolen in the breach disclosed on the company's website in September.
That month a hacker known as Gnosticplayers told cybersecurity news website The Hacker News that he breached Zynga's user database and accessed 218 million user accounts. According to the complaint, the hack encompassed personally identifiable information including user names, email addresses, login IDs, password reset tokens, Facebook IDs, Zynga account IDs and passwords stored with outdated cryptography. The breach affected Zynga users that played games including Words with Friends, Draw Something, and OMGPOP, according to the complaint.
The suit claims that Zynga has so far not alerted users via email, an action plaintiffs claim could trigger users to take precautionary steps to prevent further potential damages from the breach. The suit says the company seems to be "far more concerned with protecting itself than with safeguarding the valuable and confidential information of its users."
A company representative didn't respond to a message seeking comment Wednesday.
The complaint notes that the company opened its September "Player Security Announcement" disclosing the breach by saying: "Cyber attacks are one of the unfortunate realities of doing business today."
Tuesday's lawsuit, brought on behalf of Michigan woman Amy Gitre and a minor from Kansas proceeding under his initials, I.C., seeks to certify subclasses of adult customers and minors. The plaintiffs' lawyers claim that minors are not bound by contractual terms forced upon Zynga users at sign-up. The complaint also claims that Zynga has a substantial number of minor users who are more susceptible to long-term damages stemming from data breaches since they have clean credit histories and tend not to monitor financial activity conducted under their name.
The complaint cites a Carnegie Mellon University study based on identity protection scans of 40,000 U.S. children, which found that the risk of someone using their Social Security number was 51 times higher than that of adults.
"Based on the common use of mobile games among minors, Zynga was well aware of the economic and reputational value of exploiting children for its own monetary gain, and it should have been equally concerned with protecting the PII entrusted to it by that valuable and relatively defenseless group," the complaint says.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readRobert Downey Jr. Says He 'Intends to Sue' All Future Executives Who Use His AI Replica
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250