After California Investments, National Labor and Employment Firm Jackson Lewis Sees Profits Rise
Revenue from its California practice grew by 15% to 20% last year, while the firm continues to invest in its data analytics team.
March 04, 2020 at 03:09 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
National labor and employment firm Jackson Lewis reported healthy revenue and profit growth for 2019, as the firm continued to expand its lawyer head count.
Revenue grew 8.6% to $486.15 million, which bumped up revenue per lawyer by 5.2% to $562,000. A 9.1% hike in net income translated into a 5.1% increase in average profits per equity partner of $634,000.
Co-chair Kevin Lauri attributed Jackson Lewis' growth to "strong demand across the board." Lauri said the firm's employment litigation and counseling practice stayed busy, while its class action practice continued to expand.
Lauri, who is in New York City, and his co-chair, Will Anthony in Albany, New York, were elected co-leaders of the firm in 2018 and are serving a four-year term. "We are proud of what we achieved financially [last year] and how we are serving our clients," Lauri said.
Jackson Lewis, a New York-founded firm that has become the nation's second-largest labor and employment firm, increased overall lawyer head count by 3.2% last year, for 865 lawyers.
Even as the number of attorneys grew, average hours billed per attorney stayed steady, reflecting strong demand for the firm's services, Lauri said. Jackson Lewis' lawyers billed on average 1,677 hours.
The labor and employment firm added 20 lateral partners—including 10 in the fourth quarter of 2019, Lauri said, and opened two new offices in Silicon Valley and Charlotte, North Carolina, for a total of 61 locations, all in the United States. It also promoted 37 lawyers to partner.
The net total number of partners held steady at 447, but Jackson Lewis increased the number of equity partners by a net of 10 (3.9%), while its income partner count dipped commensurately to 183.
Jackson Lewis recruited employment litigator Neda N. Dal Cielo from rival labor and employment firm Littler Mendelson to head the new Silicon Valley office, which now has four lawyers. That is the firm's sixth California office, where it also has locations in San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego.
Lauri said the firm is planning to open another Southern California office in Riverside.
He added that California is an important investment area. Revenue from its California practice grew by 15% to 20% last year, he said, adding "We don't see that slowing down."
Internal Investments
Jackson Lewis invested in training lawyers and technology last year, Lauri said, while continuing its commitment to diversity. "One of our main goals is holding onto our culture of collaboration and collegiality," Lauri said.
The firm held a trial academy, convening 40 of its partners who are trial lawyers to meet with judges and hone courtroom advocacy skills over several days, Lauri said, adding that the firm won 19 trials for clients last year.
On the technology side, Jackson Lewis hired a new chief technology officer and its first-ever chief innovation officer, after adding its first diversity and inclusion director at the end of 2018.
The firm is further investing in data analytics, Lauri said, building off a group of about 25 data analytics professionals on a team initially established to serve its class action practice and affirmative action group. That practice prepares about 2,500 affirmative action plans annually for companies and defends them in Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program audits.
The analytics team is now serving other practices as well, and Lauri said the firm is exploring offering its predictive analytics and other data analysis services to general practice firms with class action practices.
"We want to be great lawyers at Jackson Lewis and make sure that everyone is working together," he said.
|The Work
High-profile matters for the firm last year included representing the Arizona Board of Regents in settling a gender discrimination suit brought by female deans at the University of Arizona, alleging unequal pay. The deans were represented by employment plaintiffs firm Sanford Heisler Sharp. The firm also represented the University of Arizona in a probe by the National Collegiate Athletic Association over a basketball coach convicted of accepted $20,000 in bribes from a sports agent.
Jackson Lewis represented Google in an action brought by the U.S. Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs seeking access to Google's salary history for 25,000 employees going back to the company's formation in 1998, as part of a federal compliance review looking at alleged pay disparities. The DOL last year dropped its appeal of a 2017 ruling that said its salary history demands were over-broad.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250