Superior Court Candidate Who Changed Name to 'Judge' Not Likely to Win Seat
Judge Mike Cummins' strategy of legally changing his first name to "Judge" did not land him a seat on the Los Angeles County Superior Court.
March 04, 2020 at 08:26 PM
4 minute read
Gwyneth Paltrow and other goopy acolytes might recommend manifesting the job you want, but it's possible a candidate for Los Angeles Superior Court took that philosophy a little too far.
In the race for judge of Los Angeles County's Superior Court office No. 76, Judge Mike Cummins lost to Deputy District Attorney Emily Cole, managing to capture just 16.76% of the reported Super Tuesday vote, according to election results posted by the Los Angeles County Registrar on Wednesday.
No, Cummins is not an incumbent judge. He changed his first name to "Judge" in 2017 and appeared on the LA County ballot as "Judge Mike Cummins, Retired Counselor-at-Law."
Cummins was indeed appointed to a judgeship for Stanislaus Municipal Court in 1994 but resigned in 2006 to make an ultimately unsuccessful bid for the Stanislaus County district attorney's office. In 2018, he lost to an incumbent for district attorney in San Luis Obispo County.
Ahead of this week's vote, Cummins received a "not qualified" rating from the Los Angeles County Bar Association's Judicial Elections Evaluation Committee, a designation the group gave to three other judicial candidates. The rating is bestowed on prospective judges who the committee finds lack attributes such as integrity, fairness, experience or a good professional reputation.
Cummins did not respond to an email or voicemail Wednesday afternoon.
On Twitter, some voters found the tactic humorous, with one user calling it "the funniest race on my CA primary ballot," while others called the move a "scam."
Cole, who specialized in prosecuting sex crimes in LA, called the race "unique." She said she didn't take any chances during the campaign, attending all the clubs, bar associations, voter events and even chatted up future constituents at the farmers market. "My opponent had the appearance of incumbency," she said.
She said she pulled out all the campaign stops, because it could have been a precedent-setting election with repercussions for what people would do in future judge races . "I was afraid that this is something other people would try to emulate in judge races if he would win," she said.
Cole said she understands that his explanation has been that he can't put retired judge on the ballot—because of election laws that require candidates to use their most recent occupation—but he felt it was important for voters to know he had that experience. However, there are other ways to get that message across besides getting around an election law for personal gain, she said.
"It should have been his response to campaign like I did and educate the electorate," she said. "A judge should always try to follow the law. That is our job. So, I didn't feel like that was an ethical decision."
Cole said it's possible that Cummins' decision to change his name hurt him in the long run, citing the wide margin of the loss, which she said some sitting judges have told her is the most significant they've ever seen.
The deputy assistant DA won't take the bench until 2021. She's spent the last 13 years as a victims advocate but said she's looking forward to positively impacting defendants as well. For instance, she plans to work with labor unions to help funnel former defendants who are on probation into apprenticeship programs, so that they can make better lives for themselves.
"I just want to have a meaningful effect on the lives that come into my courtroom," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
4 minute readInsurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250