Ventura Judge Faces Misconduct Charges for 'Undignified, Discourteous' Comments
"You engaged in undignified, discourteous and offensive sexualized (or otherwise crude) conduct in the workplace," the Commission on Judicial Performance said in its complaint against Judge Jeffrey Bennett. His attorneys at Klinedinst said the judge "sincerely apologized to the commission and implemented a thoughtfully developed plan for improvement and change."
March 04, 2020 at 04:08 PM
4 minute read
State judicial disciplinarians have launched formal proceedings against a Ventura County judge accused of making demeaning and unprofessional comments to lawyers and courthouse employees.
Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court, elected to the bench in 2008, faces six counts of misconduct stemming from more than two dozen events between 2010 and 2018, according to a notice made public Wednesday by the Commission on Judicial Performance. If the commission finds the charges are proven, Bennett faces discipline ranging from private admonishment to removal from office.
"You engaged in undignified, discourteous and offensive sexualized (or otherwise crude) conduct in the workplace," the commission wrote in its complaint.
In a statement, Bennett's attorneys at Klinedinst called the judge "straightforward and honest" with a "refreshing 'tell it like it is' approach to life" and sense of humor.
"Prior to the initiation of formal proceedings, Judge Bennett admitted he had made inappropriate comments," Bennett's attorneys, Heather Rosing, Dan Agle and Irean Zhang, said. "He sincerely apologized to the commission and implemented a thoughtfully developed plan for improvement and change."
"With the initiation of formal proceedings, Judge Bennett wants the public and his colleagues on the court to know that he will continue acting in the best interest of the Ventura County Superior Court and the justice system he has so honorably served for the past four decades," the attorneys wrote.
The charges portray a judge with a sharp tongue whose harsh words were often directed at prosecutors in his courtroom or in his chambers.
In a 2017 chambers conference with attorneys, Bennett complained about how poorly Attorney General Xavier Becerra's office prosecuted cases, according to commission investigators. When a deputy attorney general noted that the judge had excluded most of her evidence in a case, Benett replied, "'You can tell [the attorney general] that's what he gets for going against my president,' or words to that effect," according to the complaint.
In a 2015 case, Bennett told a deputy district attorney that his position in a criminal case was "chicken shit" and that he wouldn't tolerate the DA bringing such charges when he took over the court's master calendar department, the complaint said.
In a 2016 in-chambers settlement discussion, the commission said Bennett accused a deputy district attorney of complaining about his actions in a previous case, causing him to incur $10,000 in legal bills to defend himself in a disciplinary matter.
"You [Bennett] falsely stated that your name had been 'clear[ed]' in the 2015 commission matter, and falsely stated that you had to pay lawyers $10,000 in connection with your defense in the matter," the complaint said.
Bennett is also accused of warning an African American defendant to stop "shucking and jiving" and telling two attorneys in his chambers about his "smoking hot 10″ dental hygienist whom he would let "do whatever she wanted" to him.
A former police officer, Bennett joined the Ventura County district attorney's office in 1989, eventually rising to the role of chief deputy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Judges Question 9th Circuit’s Unique Binding Dicta Rule. The Criticism Isn't New.
Two Judges. 60-Plus Years on the Bench. Plenty of Advice.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250