As Coronavirus Shutters Quinn's NY Office, Firms Weigh Remote Work Options
Law firms face a test over how to conduct business effectively with offices closed. But if the virus wreaks enough economic havoc, remote working may be the least of their problems.
March 09, 2020 at 06:08 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's weeklong closure of its New York office after a partner tested positive for the COVID-19 coronavirus is forcing the industry to reckon with a serious question: Can Big Law work remotely?
A number of law firm leaders said in interviews Monday that they're equipped and ready to have their lawyers and staff work from home for the short term. But working remotely for a long period of time poses a major test for an industry that is built on relationships.
"The legal industry is still an apprenticeship, and we're still trying to train our young lawyers to become partners and take over the firm and become the next generation of firm leaders," said Peter Miller, the chair and managing partner of Seyfarth Shaw. "There's no substitute for face-to-face teaching and the like."
Fully remote work can weigh on a law firm's culture and "cohesion," said Dion Cominos, the managing partner of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani. Approximately 10% to 20% of Gordon Rees' lawyers work mainly remotely, but that has to be balanced out with in-person meetings and social functions, he added.
"You still have a need for people to feel connected to a larger whole. If you're doing everything virtually, it can be isolating," Cominos said.
Legal recruiting and developing new clients can also take a hit if in-person meetings are put on the back burner, said Zeughauser Group consultant Kent Zimmermann, adding that it's "hard to close the deal remotely."
In technical terms, plenty of aspects of a legal practice can be performed remotely, law firm leaders noted, including actually closing a deal for clients. Certain activities do require personal contact, including jury selection, oral arguments and going to trial.
Some of those activities are already starting to be curtailed in the face of a virus that has infected over 113,700 people and killed at least 3,999 people across 97 countries as of Monday afternoon, according to a New York Times tally. On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announced it was canceling all en banc hearings and non-case related meetings scheduled for this week.
Separately, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Monday announced it was banning all persons who have been to China, Iran, Italy, Japan and South Korea within the past 14 days.
Quinn Emanuel opted to close its New York office—where more than 200 of its lawyers are based—after one of its partners contracted the coronavirus. Earlier this month, lawyers at the small Midtown Manhattan law firm of Lewis and Garbuz were sent home after one of the firm's lawyers tested positive for the coronavirus.
The closure of Quinn Emanuel and Lewis and Garbuz comes as a growing number of firms are creating working groups to advise clients on how the virus will impact them, while the firms themselves are canceling partner retreats and restricting travel.
Leaders at Perkins Coie, for example, said they're implementing business resiliency plans they drafted months ago, before the coronavirus was known. Although the firm hasn't closed any of its 21 offices, it has restricted travel for its lawyers and staff and canceled all large internal and external events meetings through April 1.
"We're already a dispersed global set of teams. It's a matter of moving them out a little further in terms of local workspaces," said Rick Howell, the firm's chief information officer.
Remote working may be a challenge for law firms, but Zimmermann believes the real disruption will come as firms begin to feel the impact of the broader economic crisis sweeping whole countries and industries due to the virus. On Monday alone, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped nearly 8%—more than 2,000 points.
The U.S. legal industry was, on average, already seeing weaker demand in a strong economy, according to data from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group and Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group, Zimmermann said. What happens if the economy does go into a downturn, he asked.
"The question of working remotely is one thing. But a much bigger issue for law firms is what the macro economy does to the demand environment," Zimmermann said. "With the uncertainty a weakening macro-economy brings, that's going to slow down many transactions, if not throw pause them or throw them off-track. It's going to slow spending."
Read More
International Partners Will Not Attend UK Firm Conference Over Virus Fears
Coronavirus Closures Hit Law Schools at Stanford, Columbia and Several Others
Sidley Austin Cancels Partners Meeting in Florida Amid Coronavirus Spread
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250