Remaining Plaintiffs in 'Mommy Track' Suit Against Morrison & Foerster Fight Requests for Records From Freshfields, Linklaters
Attorneys representing two former Morrison & Foerster lawyers who sued the firm claiming it discriminates against pregnant women and new mothers have asked the judge overseeing their lawsuit to quash the firm's subpoenas seeking their personnel files from other firms.
March 10, 2020 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
Two former Morrison & Foerster lawyers who sued the firm claiming it discriminates against pregnant women and new mothers are seeking to block Morrison & Foerster's request for employment records at other law firms where they've worked.
Attorneys at Sanford Heisler Sharp representing plaintiffs Sherry William and Joshua Ashley Klayman have asked the federal magistrate judge overseeing their lawsuit to quash subpoenas seeking their personnel files from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters, respectively.
"Such subpoenas are commonly regarded as improper attempts to harass and deter plaintiff and interfere with her job prospects," wrote Sanford Heisler's Deborah Marcuse, in a discovery letter brief filed jointly Monday evening with Morrison & Foerster's lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. "By bringing this action, Plaintiffs have not exposed their former and current job records to carte blanche scrutiny regardless of relevance and proportionality," Marcuse wrote.
According to the filing, Morrison & Foerster is seeking documents and communications regarding Freshfields' decision to classify William, who was a senior associate in Morrison & Foerster's project finance practices, as an associate in the incoming class of 2011 rather than 2010. The firm contends that it is seeking information from Freshfields for purely legitimate reasons to defend against her claims that her reclassification and termination were a pretext. "Here, Ms. William challenges Morrison's decision to reclassify her," wrote Gibson Dunn's Michele Maryott on behalf of the law firm. "Yet she has testified that this was not the first (or even second) time a law firm concluded her class year did not align to her legal skills. Both Freshfields and Dewey & LeBoeuf classified and compensated her as a member of the Class of 2011 (not 2010)," Maryott continued.
Morrison & Foerster's lawyers further contend that the firm could use information from William's Freshfields file to test the credibility of representations she made prior to her hire at Morrison & Foerster, including things she said about her experience at Freshfields that led to Morrison & Foerster's initial classification decision.
In the case of Klayman, who is now senior counsel at Linklaters and head of the firm's U.S. fintech and blockchain and digital assets practices, Morrison & Foerster is seeking communications she had with Linklaters about her claims against the firm, her performance and disciplinary records covering about a year's time, and documents relating to her current compensation and benefits, including representations she made during negotiations with Linklaters. Gibson Dunn's Maryott wrote that "to the extent that [Klayman] attributes the fact she was not promoted to partner at Morrison to discrimination, the reasons that she was not hired by Linklaters as a partner either, nor yet promoted to that position, may corroborate the non-discriminatory reasons Morrison did not promote her, and otherwise contradict any suggestion that those reasons are pretextual."
In an email statement, Sanford Heisler's David Sanford said that Morrison & Foerster's request for personal records "continues its unseemly scorched earth defense."
"MoFo intrudes here into plaintiffs' privacy interests and undercuts its purported commitment to women. Not a good way to litigate. And not a good message to send to its female lawyers and to those female lawyers thinking about joining MoFo," Sanford said.
Gibson Dunn's Maryott didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment Tuesday morning. Morrison & Foerster last month, however, hailed the plaintiffs' withdrawal of $100 million in proposed class action claims in the lawsuit as a sort of vindication.
"Dropping all of the class action and collective action claims, it's a clear indication that there's no supporting fact pattern of any of the systemic issues of gender discrimination that they've alleged," Morrison & Foerster chairman Larren Nashelsky told ALM at the time.
Read more:
War of Words Follows Class Action Retreat in MoFo 'Mommy Track' Suit
LA Associate, Linklaters Crypto Expert Move Forward With 'Mommy Track' Suit Against MoFo
In 'Mommy Track' Lawsuit Against Morrison & Foerster, 5 Jane Doe Plaintiffs Settle
In 'Mommy Track' Lawsuit, MoFo Points to Its Track Record for Defense
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readPearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250