Addressing Coronavirus, 9th Circuit Offers Video Conferencing for Some Hearings, Postpones Others
Among the changes the court rescheduled and relocated arguments initially set to be heard between March 30 and April 3 in Seattle to the Ninth Circuit courthouse in Pasadena.
March 12, 2020 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is rolling out video conferencing for judges and lawyers, at least in some cases, rescheduling two high-profile cases in Las Vegas, and relocating panel arguments initially scheduled for the court's Seattle courthouse to Pasadena, California as more courts enact plans in response to the coronavirus outbreak.
The court offered up the remote communication in a filing Thursday in a fraud and breach of contract case against Oculus VR and its founder Palmer Luckey.
"In light of coronavirus concerns, the court is willing to have lawyers appear for argument on March 24, 2020 by video conference," wrote U.S. District Judge Terrence Berg of the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. "The judges may also appear by video conference."
Katherine M. Rodriguez, the court's communications administrator for the Office of the Circuit Executive, said the court will allow telephone and video conferencing more broadly during the health emergency. "The court will be communicating with counsel in advance of each sitting to discuss options," she said in an email.
The Ninth Circuit also announced Thursday that it is postponing two hearings at Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse in Las Vegas in cases against defendants Cliven Bundy, a Nevada rancher, and Todd Engel, an Idaho man, who engaged in a standoff against officers over public land. The cases were originally scheduled to be heard on March 23.
The court also issued an order in cases rescheduling and relocating arguments initially set to be heard between March 30 and April 3 in Seattle to the Ninth Circuit courthouse in Pasadena.
The court noted that state and local health officials have advised people over the age of 60 years of age and those with underlying health conditions or compromised immune systems to stay at home and away from large groups in the area.
"Because the situation may change in terms of national and/or local health directives, counsel should not make nonrefundable travel arrangements," the court said. "It is possible that in-person court proceedings may be cancelled, in which case the court will likely hear all argument via telephonic appearances." The court indicated that any attorney wishing to appear by telephone conference would be permitted to do so, those with a video system compatible with the court's system could appear by video, and that all lawyers from Washington state could appear via video from the court's Nakamura Courthouse in Seattle.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/03/Apple-computer-sign-767x633.jpg)
Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute read![Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/10/US-Department-of-Justice-Building-2022-006-767x633-5.jpg)
![Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/therecorder/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2023/08/401161841.jpg)
Hawaii wildfire victims spared from testifying after last-minute deal over $4B settlement
4 minute read![State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/therecorder/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2024/04/2nd-District-767x633-1.jpg)
State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
- 2Upstart Insurer That's Wowing Industry Hires AIG Legal Exec to Help Guide Global Expansion
- 3Connecticut Lawyers in Spotlight for Repping FBI Agents
- 4SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 5Lawsuit Accuses University of California of Racial Discrimination in Admissions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250