Northern District of California Closes Courthouses, Puts Off New Trials Until at Least May
The court issued two general orders Monday that said the court will decide civil matters on the papers and conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or video conference, as six Bay Area counties were set to "shelter in place" through April 7.
March 17, 2020 at 01:08 AM
3 minute read
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has closed all courthouses to the public and suspended civil and criminal trials until May 1.
The court issued two general orders Monday signed by Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton on the same day six Bay Area counties demanded residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of coronavirus.
Hamilton's orders also said the court will decide civil matters on the papers and conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or video conference.
Although criminal proceedings before magistrate judges are set to continue, the court also plans to conduct those hearings remotely when possible, the orders note. Criminal hearings will also be consolidated and cases in all four Northern District divisions will be heard in San Francisco.
"Due to the Court's reduced ability to obtain an adequate spectrum of jurors and the effect of the above public health recommendations on the availability of counsel and court staff to be present in the courtroom, the time period of the continuances implemented by this General Order will be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, as the Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by ordering the continuances outweigh the interest of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A)," Hamilton wrote.
Also on Monday, a criminal trial already underway in the San Francisco courthouse was affected by the public health crisis. Lawyers for Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Nikulin, a Russian facing criminal trial on charges that he hacked into computers belonging to tech companies, including LinkedIn and Dropbox, filed court papers asking for a 30-day continuance in the trial. Nikulin's lawyers noted that a Secret Service agent set to be called as a witness for the prosecution had indicated that he had possibly been exposed to the coronavirus through travel and contact with a person exhibiting symptoms. U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who is overseeing the proceedings, issued an order suspending the trial for two days, subject to further continuances. The judge also asked jurors about any hardships they might have if the trial were to continue later in the week or after the local shelter in place directive, currently set to run through April 7, is lifted. Federal prosecutors wrote a brief exploring the possibility of midtrial continuance or mistrial without taking a position on Nikulin's lawyers' request.
Nikulin's lawyer, Valery Nechay, in an email to Courthouse News Service, called the situation "unchartered territory" and said the defense team is evaluating steps "every day, and sometimes every hour," as more information becomes available.
"We are very concerned about our client Mr. Nikulin, as well as the thousands of other non-violent pretrial detainees that are languishing in custody for undetermined periods of time as a result of this pandemic, and residual court closures and suspensions of due process."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Appeals Court Rejects Marijuana Grow Permit, Citing Federal Illegality
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250