Northern District of California Closes Courthouses, Puts Off New Trials Until at Least May
The court issued two general orders Monday that said the court will decide civil matters on the papers and conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or video conference, as six Bay Area counties were set to "shelter in place" through April 7.
March 17, 2020 at 01:08 AM
3 minute read
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has closed all courthouses to the public and suspended civil and criminal trials until May 1.
The court issued two general orders Monday signed by Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton on the same day six Bay Area counties demanded residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of coronavirus.
Hamilton's orders also said the court will decide civil matters on the papers and conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or video conference.
Although criminal proceedings before magistrate judges are set to continue, the court also plans to conduct those hearings remotely when possible, the orders note. Criminal hearings will also be consolidated and cases in all four Northern District divisions will be heard in San Francisco.
"Due to the Court's reduced ability to obtain an adequate spectrum of jurors and the effect of the above public health recommendations on the availability of counsel and court staff to be present in the courtroom, the time period of the continuances implemented by this General Order will be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, as the Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by ordering the continuances outweigh the interest of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A)," Hamilton wrote.
Also on Monday, a criminal trial already underway in the San Francisco courthouse was affected by the public health crisis. Lawyers for Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Nikulin, a Russian facing criminal trial on charges that he hacked into computers belonging to tech companies, including LinkedIn and Dropbox, filed court papers asking for a 30-day continuance in the trial. Nikulin's lawyers noted that a Secret Service agent set to be called as a witness for the prosecution had indicated that he had possibly been exposed to the coronavirus through travel and contact with a person exhibiting symptoms. U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who is overseeing the proceedings, issued an order suspending the trial for two days, subject to further continuances. The judge also asked jurors about any hardships they might have if the trial were to continue later in the week or after the local shelter in place directive, currently set to run through April 7, is lifted. Federal prosecutors wrote a brief exploring the possibility of midtrial continuance or mistrial without taking a position on Nikulin's lawyers' request.
Nikulin's lawyer, Valery Nechay, in an email to Courthouse News Service, called the situation "unchartered territory" and said the defense team is evaluating steps "every day, and sometimes every hour," as more information becomes available.
"We are very concerned about our client Mr. Nikulin, as well as the thousands of other non-violent pretrial detainees that are languishing in custody for undetermined periods of time as a result of this pandemic, and residual court closures and suspensions of due process."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250