In Latest US News Rankings, Berkeley Law Ticks Up 1 Spot, UC Davis Falls 7
Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law was the big winner among the state's law schools in the rankings released Tuesday. The Orange County school surged up 21 spots to land at No. 111.
March 17, 2020 at 07:00 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While it was largely business as usual among the top schools in the latest law school rankings from U.S. News & World Report, there was some significant movement among the California schools on the list.
Yale Law School retained its stranglehold on the top spot, with Stanford Law School and Harvard Law School repeating at Nos. 2 and 3, respectively. The only change among the top five schools was Columbia Law School moving up one slot to tie with the University of Chicago Law School at No. 4.
The University of California, Berkeley School of Law joined Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law with both schools moving up one spot to tie at No. 9.
"I think this recognizes the breadth of our excellence in so many different fields," wrote Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky in a blog post celebrating what he called some good news in "a time of great stress and uncertainty."
"Although I recognize that rankings are problematic, altogether these rankings are a reflection of our being a terrific law school," Chemerinsky wrote. "These rankings are a result of the enormous hard work of our faculty, staff, and students. They also are a product of the essential support from our alumni."
In the Golden State, Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law saw the biggest gains. The Orange County school surged up 21 spots to land at No. 111 in the rankings released Tuesday.
Earlier this year, the school boasted that Chapman Law saw the largest jump in the credentials of incoming students of any law school in the U.S. from 2016 to 2019, with the median LSAT score increasing from 155 to 158, and the median undergraduate GPA increasing from 3.24 to 3.49.
"Our progress is a testament to the strength and diversity of our student body and the great work being done by the faculty and staff here at the law school," said Chapman Law Dean Matthew Parlow said at the time. "I'm proud of the many ways our school continues to excel among law schools nationally."
The University of California, Davis School of Law saw the biggest drop among California schools on the list, falling seven spots to No. 38.
A spokesperson for the school and Dean Kevin Johnson weren't available for comment by the time of this story.
It remains to be seen whether the influential rankings will generate much reaction among the legal academy this go around. They are being released at a time when every law school in the country is struggling to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic and virtually all 200 schools are moving classes online. Typically, deans at schools with large moves up or down the rankings either trumpet that improvement or offer explanations or reactions to major drops. But the rankings may well be overshadowed by the push to keep law schools functioning virtually. Unlike in years past, early versions of the rankings did not leak on legal blogs ahead of the official publication.
In San Francisco, the University of California Hastings Dean David Faigman noted the incongruity in a message to all students, faculty, and staff.
"Ordinarily, this is the time of year when I write regarding news of our rankings as tabulated by U.S. News. These, however, are no ordinary times," Faigman wrote. "Indeed, it feels surreal to even nod toward a highly contested ranking formula designed by a private news organization. Yet, at the same time, perhaps a little normality is needed just now."
The school reversed a recent downward trend moving up three spots, from 62 to 59.
Faigman indicated that he expects the school's rankings to improve further in the coming year since this year's rankings are based on 2018 bar passage and employment statistics and the school has since improved bar passage rates by 20 percentage points and employment by 11.2%.
Elsewhere in the state, the University of Southern California Gould School of Law was up one spot to No. 18, the University of California, Irvine School of Law was down four to No. 27, Pepperdine University School of Law was up four spots to no. 47, the University of San Diego School of Law was up three spots to No. 83, and Santa Clara University School of Law fell three spots to No. 107. Holding steady were the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law at No. 15 and Loyola Law School, Los Angeles at No. 62. The state's remaining law schools stayed among the unranked tier of schools.
Among the top 50 schools nationally, Fordham University School of Law was the big winner.
The Manhattan law school rocketed up 12 spots to land at No. 27 in the closely watched rankings—by far the largest jump among the top 50 schools.
It appears that Fordham's impressive gain is due largely to improved employment outcomes for the class of 2018. More than 74% of that class had jobs at graduation, and nearly 88% were employed at graduation—up from 62% and 77% last year, respectively.
"We judge ourselves more by the accomplishments of our students, faculty and alumni than by an external ranking, but I am pleased to see the excellence of our law school recognized," said Fordham law dean Matthew Diller. "Our rise was fueled by strong employment numbers—both at graduation and 10 months after, as well as increases in reputation among the bench and bar and strong admissions. The school also did well in a broad range of specialty areas."
U.S. News added four new specialty rankings to its offerings this year to the existing seven—business and corporate law, contracts and commercial law, criminal law and constitutional law. The specialty rankings are calculated by survey responses from legal academics.
Columbia snagged the top spot in both the business law and contracts categories, while NYU took the No. 1 ranking for criminal law. Yale topped the list for constitutional law.
The rankings released Tuesday did not include the much-discussed new scholarly impact ranking, which U.S. News has said it plans to release later this year. Legal academics have fiercely debated the merits of the proposed new ranking, which will be based on the citations of faculty scholarship.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
- 2Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
- 3New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
- 4Family of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
- 5Houston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250