California Eases Layoff Rules as Businesses Reel From COVID-19 Pandemic
The governor gave the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency until March 23 to issue guidance for companies on complying with the executive order.
March 18, 2020 at 06:42 PM
3 minute read
Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed an executive order freeing employers from some state restrictions governing mass layoffs and employee relocations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The action temporarily suspends requirements that businesses that have employed 75 or more full- and part-time employees in the 12 months give 60 days warning that they plan to terminate a large number of workers. The order instead requires businesses hurt by coronavirus-related conditions to give "as much notice as is practicable" and to tell laid-off and furloughed employees that they may qualify for unemployment insurance.
The move is "a big deal for employers who are … forced to lay off at least 50 employees or cease operations," David Reis, head of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer's labor and employment practice group, said Wednesday.
"This executive order will allow them to avoid paying the statutory and civil penalties that would otherwise follow from a shut down or mass layoff where the employer doesn't provide at least 60 days' notice," Reis said. "Many employers were worried about the uncertainty over whether they would risk having to pay 60 days' wages as a penalty under Cal-WARN if they had to shut down or conduct a mass layoff."
The changes, in effect during the declared coronavirus emergency, align the state's layoff-alert law more closely with the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, better known as the WARN Act.
The governor gave the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency until March 23 to issue guidance for companies on complying with the executive order.
Newsom signed the order as companies in the retail, restaurant, travel and hospitality industries reel from widespread shelter-in-place orders around the state and general guidance by health authorities for the public to avoid gatherings.
A survey released Tuesday by NPR, PBS Newshour and Marist of 835 working adults in the United States found that 18% reported losing work hours or being laid off due to the coronavirus. Thousands of employees are facing reduced shifts or being laid off across industries, as companies respond to reduced demand, according to a new Wall Street Journal report.
"Many, many companies will be impacted," said Mandana Massoumi, who leads Manatt, Phelps & Phillips' retail and consumer products practice. "A lot of organizations are reassessing options as they consider the new reality."
Late Wednesday, the U.S. Senate passed a $104 billion package that includes boosts to unemployment insurance. Last week, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, introduced legislation "prohibiting employers from firing, punishing or otherwise discriminating against a worker who is quarantined or isolated."
More than two dozen cities, states and U.S. territories have some version of a layoff notification law. Those are now under scrutiny by many jurisdictions.
"Quite frankly we see developments happening on an hourly basis," Massoumi said. "This is a fast-moving topic that is changing and is being modified. These are truly unprecedented times."
Read more:
In Criminal Trial, a Call for COVID-19 Tests to Protect Defendant and His Lawyers
9th Circuit Shuts Down Public Access to Courthouses
How COVID-19 Is Impacting California Courts: Roundup of Services
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250