In Stalled Criminal Trial, a Call for COVID-19 Tests to Protect a Defendant and His Lawyers
"For Christ's sake we've got a trial going on out here. Can't we get at least enough test kits to ensure that the defendant is healthy?," said U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California at a hearing in a case involving a Russian man charged with hacking California-based tech companies.
March 18, 2020 at 05:48 PM
5 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO—What do you do when a global public health crisis interrupts a federal criminal trial?
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California had to grapple with that question at a hearing Wednesday afternoon in the case involving Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Nikulin, a Russian man charged with hacking into computers belonging to Bay Area tech companies. Chief among the judge's frustrations was that the jail where Nikulin is being housed does not currently have any tests for the COVID-19 virus.
The trial was originally set for court days this week before "shelter in place" orders from six Bay Area counties at least temporarily derailed the proceedings. Alsup on Wednesday granted a defense request to push out the potential date to restart the trial to April 13, after the local restrictions are currently scheduled to lift. But the judge expressed concern for the defendant, who will be forced to stay in custody, and his lawyers, who will need to visit him in prison to prepare for the restart of trial. Alsup told federal prosecutors what he would have said upon hearing about the lack of tests: "For Christ's sake we've got a trial going on out here. Can't we get at least enough test kits to ensure that the defendant is healthy?"
Alsup asked prosecutors to do everything they can to make sure Nikulin is tested multiple times during the delay.
"I have a concern that the defense lawyers are put under extra burden of having to go to jail with a high concentration of people and to talk with their client," Alsup said. "That could be dangerous for them, their families and we need to spare them that extra layer of risk if we can." It's not just the situations on the ground in the Bay Area causing disruption for Nikulin's trial. In their court papers asking for a continuance, Nikulin's lawyers Adam Gasner and Valery Nechay noted that a Secret Service agent set to be called as a witness for the prosecution had indicated that he had possibly been exposed to the coronavirus through contact with a person exhibiting symptoms.
Alsup asked prosecutors Wednesday for an update on the test results on the person the witness was in contact with and the health of the potential witness himself. Assistant U.S. attorney Michelle Kane responded the government hadn't received word of the test results, but that the contact's symptoms had subsided and the agent witness had not shown any symptoms of the virus.
"That's good as far as it goes," said Alsup, but he added that it didn't go far enough.
The hearing came as the court has closed all courthouses to the public and suspended new civil and criminal trials until May 1. The Nikulin trial, which began March 10, was two days into testimony when the Northern District issued two general orders Monday signed by Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton, the same day six Bay Area counties asked residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of coronavirus.
Alsup previously issued an order suspending the trial and reached out to jurors to ask about any hardships they might have if the trial were to continue later in the week or after the local shelter in place directive, currently set to run through April 7, is lifted. The judge indicated that out of the 12 jurors and four alternates, nine people had responded. He said about two-thirds of the respondents said they could continue on the jury, and about a third expressed what looked like legitimate hardships. He said those responses meant there would be a risk that there wouldn't be enough jurors to proceed, but that it was worth trying.
"I think there is a fighting chance that we can salvage this as a fair trial," Alsup said. "I think we should give it a shot and see if we can do it."
But the judge added that he would like to put the returning jurors through voir dire again, to make sure they can remain impartial.
Nikulin's lawyers made two additional requests on the plaintiffs behalf near the end of Wednesday's hearing. They asked in light of increased solitary confinement in the jail during the health scare and the trial delay if they could provide their client with a game console, specifically one that cannot connect to WiFi given the nature of the allegations against him. They also asked if he could stay in the courthouse long enough to eat a cheeseburger they purchased him for lunch. Alsup granted both requests.
As the hearing concluded, Alsup said, "Mr. Nikulin enjoy your cheeseburger."
The extraordinary nature of the hearing was underscored by the fact that Alsup himself opened the locked courtroom doors prior to Wednesday's hearing for two journalists waiting to cover the hearing. "That's a first," said MLex correspondent Mike Swift.
"Extraordinary times," the judge replied.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250