In Stalled Criminal Trial, a Call for COVID-19 Tests to Protect a Defendant and His Lawyers
"For Christ's sake we've got a trial going on out here. Can't we get at least enough test kits to ensure that the defendant is healthy?," said U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California at a hearing in a case involving a Russian man charged with hacking California-based tech companies.
March 18, 2020 at 05:48 PM
5 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO—What do you do when a global public health crisis interrupts a federal criminal trial?
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California had to grapple with that question at a hearing Wednesday afternoon in the case involving Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich Nikulin, a Russian man charged with hacking into computers belonging to Bay Area tech companies. Chief among the judge's frustrations was that the jail where Nikulin is being housed does not currently have any tests for the COVID-19 virus.
The trial was originally set for court days this week before "shelter in place" orders from six Bay Area counties at least temporarily derailed the proceedings. Alsup on Wednesday granted a defense request to push out the potential date to restart the trial to April 13, after the local restrictions are currently scheduled to lift. But the judge expressed concern for the defendant, who will be forced to stay in custody, and his lawyers, who will need to visit him in prison to prepare for the restart of trial. Alsup told federal prosecutors what he would have said upon hearing about the lack of tests: "For Christ's sake we've got a trial going on out here. Can't we get at least enough test kits to ensure that the defendant is healthy?"
Alsup asked prosecutors to do everything they can to make sure Nikulin is tested multiple times during the delay.
"I have a concern that the defense lawyers are put under extra burden of having to go to jail with a high concentration of people and to talk with their client," Alsup said. "That could be dangerous for them, their families and we need to spare them that extra layer of risk if we can." It's not just the situations on the ground in the Bay Area causing disruption for Nikulin's trial. In their court papers asking for a continuance, Nikulin's lawyers Adam Gasner and Valery Nechay noted that a Secret Service agent set to be called as a witness for the prosecution had indicated that he had possibly been exposed to the coronavirus through contact with a person exhibiting symptoms.
Alsup asked prosecutors Wednesday for an update on the test results on the person the witness was in contact with and the health of the potential witness himself. Assistant U.S. attorney Michelle Kane responded the government hadn't received word of the test results, but that the contact's symptoms had subsided and the agent witness had not shown any symptoms of the virus.
"That's good as far as it goes," said Alsup, but he added that it didn't go far enough.
The hearing came as the court has closed all courthouses to the public and suspended new civil and criminal trials until May 1. The Nikulin trial, which began March 10, was two days into testimony when the Northern District issued two general orders Monday signed by Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton, the same day six Bay Area counties asked residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of coronavirus.
Alsup previously issued an order suspending the trial and reached out to jurors to ask about any hardships they might have if the trial were to continue later in the week or after the local shelter in place directive, currently set to run through April 7, is lifted. The judge indicated that out of the 12 jurors and four alternates, nine people had responded. He said about two-thirds of the respondents said they could continue on the jury, and about a third expressed what looked like legitimate hardships. He said those responses meant there would be a risk that there wouldn't be enough jurors to proceed, but that it was worth trying.
"I think there is a fighting chance that we can salvage this as a fair trial," Alsup said. "I think we should give it a shot and see if we can do it."
But the judge added that he would like to put the returning jurors through voir dire again, to make sure they can remain impartial.
Nikulin's lawyers made two additional requests on the plaintiffs behalf near the end of Wednesday's hearing. They asked in light of increased solitary confinement in the jail during the health scare and the trial delay if they could provide their client with a game console, specifically one that cannot connect to WiFi given the nature of the allegations against him. They also asked if he could stay in the courthouse long enough to eat a cheeseburger they purchased him for lunch. Alsup granted both requests.
As the hearing concluded, Alsup said, "Mr. Nikulin enjoy your cheeseburger."
The extraordinary nature of the hearing was underscored by the fact that Alsup himself opened the locked courtroom doors prior to Wednesday's hearing for two journalists waiting to cover the hearing. "That's a first," said MLex correspondent Mike Swift.
"Extraordinary times," the judge replied.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Meet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250