Engineer at the Heart of 'Waymo v. Uber' Pleads Guilty to Trade Secret Theft
Anthony Levandowski, a pivotal though silent player in the civil dispute between Google's Waymo subsidiary and Uber, admitted downloading at least 20 files from his Google Drive, including an internal tracking document with details of Google's self-driving car program.
March 19, 2020 at 10:27 PM
3 minute read
Correction: An earlier version of this story had the incorrect caption for the case 'Waymo v. Uber' in the headline.
Anthony Levandowski, the former head of Google's autonomous vehicle unit who was at the center of the company's high-profile dispute with Uber Technologies, has agreed to plead guilty to federal trade secret theft charges.
Federal prosecutors and lawyers for Levandowski, one of the founding members of Google's "Project Chauffeur" autonomous vehicle project, filed court papers Thursday indicating that Levandowski admitted to downloading at least 20 files from his Google Drive, including an internal tracking document titled "Chauffeur TL weekly updates – Q4 2015" that included details of Google's self-driving car program. As part of the plea agreement to one count of trade secret theft, Levandowski acknowledged that the information was not public and that he intended to use it for his own personal benefit.
"Mr. Levandowski accepts responsibility and is looking forward to resolving this matter," said Levandowski's lawyer, Miles Ehrlich of Ramsey & Ehrlich, in a statement. "Mr. Levandowski is a young man with enormous talents and much to contribute to the fast-moving world of AI and AV and we hope that this plea will allow him to move on with his life and focus his energies where they matter most," he said.
Levandowski was a pivotal—though silent—player in the civil dispute between Google's Waymo subsidiary and Uber. Waymo accused Levandowski of downloading 14,000 company files before leaving Google in 2016 to start a new company, Otto, which he quickly sold to Uber for $680 million. Levandowski formally invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in the civil dispute and refused to provide testimony. That decision resulted in Levandowski being first removed from all development of laser-based vision technology at Uber in April 2017, and then terminated by the company the next month. U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California, who oversaw the civil dispute, referred the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office for a potential criminal probe.
Uber declined to comment on the case.
Thursday's court papers asked Alsup, who has been overseeing the criminal case, as well, to set a sentencing date.
Levandowski, who was ordered to pay Google $179 million in arbitration, filed for bankruptcy earlier this year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute read'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250