Frequent Uber and Lyft Foe Says Misclassification of Drivers Is Worsening the Global Health Crisis
In a pair of emergency motions for preliminary injunction, lawyers from Lichten & Liss Riordan who represent classes of Uber and Lyft employees are asking the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to find that they should be classified as employees, so that they can take advantage of state-mandated sick leave.
March 20, 2020 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers in two worker misclassification class action suits against Uber and Lyft allege that the companies are exacerbating the coronavirus pandemic.
"This crisis starkly demonstrates the harm that Lyft's misclassification of its drivers is causing, not only to Lyft drivers, but to Lyft passengers and the general public, as drivers are deprived of an important workplace protection to which they are entitled as employees and which is designated to protect public health," wrote plaintiffs lawyers at Lichten & Liss Riordan in one of the two emergency motions for a preliminary injunction filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday.
The lawyers say the only obstacle between California ride-hailing drivers and state-mandated paid sick leave is their status as independent contractors and are asking the court to classify them as employees, according to the motions.
The drivers are "at the front lines of the crisis" as residents opt for Uber and Lyft over public transit to avoid potential contagion, the filing asserts. However, without paid sick leave drivers will continue to pick up users regardless of whether they begin to exhibit coronavirus symptoms, the lawyers contend, citing the testimony of one driver, who would continue driving "fever or no fever" to feed his children.
Uber's attorneys from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Lyft's attorneys from Keker, Van Nest & Peters removed the cases from San Francisco Superior Court to the Northern District of California earlier this week. Uber, Lyft and their attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
"Gig economy workers are exempted from the shelter in place order because they are providing essential services," Liss-Riordan said in an email. "The least they could get is recognition of employee status so they will be entitled to employee benefits."
Liss-Riordan said she's also spoken with lawmakers about the exclusion of gig workers from federal sick pay law included in the coronavirus relief legislation. "I spoke to Sen. Ed Markey about this issue last Sunday, and as a result, he sent a letter yesterday (that I worked on with him) to Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer, urging that gig economy workers be included in additional emergency legislation," she said.
The motions also cite a letter advocacy group Gig Workers Rising sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom, asking California to fully enforce Assembly Bill 5, which codifies the worker classification test developed in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, and ensure access to paid sick leave, disability, family leave and unemployment insurance.
In an investor call Thursday regarding its coronavirus response, Uber's CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said: "This situation certainly demonstrates the downside of attaching basic protections to W2 employment. What we've said very, very consistently is that we need a third way, and we think a third way is good for society, which allows workers who want flexibility to work flexibly based on what their own needs are but also have access to protections. We've been very consistent about that, and I think this kind of situation only highlights that."
Gig companies including Uber and Lyft have pledged that they would offer to pay workers for 14 days of work if they contracted coronavirus. The companies have also promised to distribute cleaning products, but The New York Times has said they have struggled to get the products to workers.
"Plaintiffs and public simply cannot wait years, or even weeks, for Uber to comply with California's state-mandated paid sick leave law. In the interim, the rapid proliferation of the virus that occurs will be irreversible."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatreon Hit With Lawsuit for Allegedly Diverting Subscriber Data to Meta
Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute read‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
6 minute readMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250