California Chief Justice Suspends Trials Statewide for 60 Days
The order also empowered trial courts to adopt any new or amended rules intended to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
March 24, 2020 at 12:17 AM
3 minute read
Under pressure from anxious lawyers, court workers and judges around the state, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye late Monday suspended all jury trials across the state for 60 days.
In an order citing constitutional and statutory authority, the chief justice also empowered trial courts to adopt "any proposed rules or rule amendment" intended to address the COVID-19 pandemic. The courts' rule changes will not have to circulate for the typical 45 days of public comment.
The order notes that courts have not been able to comply with orders for Californians to stay home and to maintain six feet of distance among themselves.
"Even if court facilities could allow for sufficient social distancing, the closure of schools means that many court employees, litigants, witnesses, and potential jurors cannot leave their homes to attend court proceedings because they must stay home to supervise their children," the order said. "These restrictions have also made it nearly impossible for courts to assemble juries."
For more than a week, Cantil-Sakauye has signed emergency orders for courts around the state, authorizing presiding judges to extend filing and proceeding deadlines and to move hearings to locations outside traditional courthouses. The result has been a patchwork of rules, with some courts shutting down and others scaling back operations but still allowing public access.
Prosecutors, private attorneys and public defenders have pleaded with the chief justice in recent days to employ uniform standards across the courts. Cantil-Sakauye has repeatedly referred in statements to her limited authority "as well as the role of independent trial courts to manage their operations."
That stance appeared to soften with the new order, which followed four days of reports of potential exposures in three courthouses.
On Thursday, a Merced County judge declared a mistrial after an expected witness in a three-defendant homicide trial warned the court that he had been in contact with a colleague who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. The witness had attended the proceedings over several days before he reported feeling ill on Thursday. At least two deputy district attorneys and one defense attorney in the case have self-quarantined.
On Monday, Los Angeles County Superior Court officials announced that a judge handling a juvenile dependency calendar had developed symptoms consistent with COVID-19. The court asked the unnamed judge, who was not tested, and court staff to self-quarantine.
That announcement followed Presiding Judge Kevin Brazile's order to close the Sylmar courthouse for three days after a deputy public defender who appeared there was diagnosed with the novel coronavirus.
Brazile on Monday said that only attorneys, judges, court staff and litigants with business before the court will be allowed into the county's 38 courthouses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250