San Jose Federal Courthouse Closed After Visitor Treated for COVID-19
After the court was informed Monday that a person who visited the Northern District of California courthouse on March 11, 13, and 17 was treated for COVID-19, Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton amended the general order outlining guidelines concerning courthouse access during the coronavirus outbreak.
March 24, 2020 at 11:43 AM
3 minute read
Updated with further information from the court at 9:35 AM on 3/24/20.
The San Jose federal courthouse has temporarily closed after a visitor to the courthouse reported being treated for COVID-19. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California announced late Monday that the courthouse at 280 South First St. "will be closed to staff and the public entirely" from March 24 until at least April 7.
After the court was informed Monday that a person who visited the courthouse on March 11, 13, and 17 was treated for COVID-19, Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton amended the March 16 general order outlining guidelines concerning courthouse access during the coronavirus outbreak. The order indicated that the closure, which applies to the public and courthouse staff including judges, could be extended if needed. A court spokesman said the court would not provide further details about the visitor. The spokesman further said that the closure does not apply to other offices in the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building across from the courthouse entrance.
Facebook Deputy GC Paul Grewal, who used to work in the building as a federal magistrate judge, reacted to the news on Twitter Monday evening.
"This is like Santa closing the North Pole," Grewal wrote. "Unimaginable."
The San Jose courthouse closure comes after the court earlier this month closed all courthouses to the general public and suspended civil and criminal trials until May 1. Hamilton issued two general orders on March 16, the same day six Bay Area counties demanded residents "shelter in place" to slow the spread of coronavirus. Hamilton's orders also said the court will decide civil matters on the papers and conduct any necessary hearings via telephone or video conference. The court clarified that members of the press and public with a legitimate need to observe an in-person hearing could do so, and such attendance will be considered "official court business."
Although criminal proceedings before magistrate judges are set to continue, the court also plans to conduct those hearings remotely when possible, the orders note. Criminal hearings will also be consolidated and cases in all four Northern District divisions will be heard in San Francisco.
"Due to the Court's reduced ability to obtain an adequate spectrum of jurors and the effect of the above public health recommendations on the availability of counsel and court staff to be present in the courtroom, the time period of the continuances implemented by this General Order will be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, as the Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by ordering the continuances outweigh the interest of the public and any defendant's right to a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A)," Hamilton wrote.
The San Jose federal courthouse closure comes as Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye late Monday suspended all jury trials in California's state courts for 60 days. following four days of reports of potential exposures in three courthouses.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute read'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250