Ventura Judge Censured for Years of 'Sexist and Unseemly' Remarks
"Judge Bennett has accepted this censure, taken full responsibility for his conduct, and is committed to improving as a judicial officer," lawyers for Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court said.
March 25, 2020 at 02:29 PM
3 minute read
A Ventura county judge accused of making crude and demeaning comments to lawyers and court employees has been censured under an agreement reached with state judicial disciplinarians.
Judge Jeffrey Bennett of the Ventura County Superior Court acknowledged he acted inappropriately in 28 instances over eight years, according to a decision and order released Wednesday by the Commission on Judicial Performance.
"Judges are … expected to display appropriate demeanor and decorum, and not to use crass or sexist words and imagery, as Judge Bennett has done," the commission said. "For example, Judge Bennett's references to his 'balls' and his 'ass' diminish the dignity of his office. His gratuitous comments about 'chicks' liking a car, and to not spending so much time with his telescope if he had a '20-year-old smoking hot wife,' are sexist and unseemly. His use of profanity, such as 'fucking' and 'shit,' degrades the decorum of the court and reflects negatively on the judiciary."
A censure, the most severe punishment that can be leveled short of removal from office, will allow Bennett to continue serving on the Ventura County bench. Commissioners took Bennett's acknowledgement of almost every charge against him as a significant mitigating factor in determining his punishment, the order said.
Bennett's attorneys at Klinedinst—Heather Rosing, Dan Agle and Irean Zhang—have described the former police officer as a "straightforward and honest" man with a "refreshing 'tell it like it is' approach to life" and sense of humor.
"Judge Bennett has accepted this censure, taken full responsibility for his conduct, and is committed to improving as a judicial officer," the attorneys said in a statement Wednesday. "He has always acted in the best interest of the Ventura County Superior Court and is looking forward to continuing to serve the public and the administration of justice."
Elected in 2008, Bennett was portrayed in charging documents as a judge with a penchant for berating prosecutors and making unprofessional remarks.
Bennett warned an African American defendant to stop "shucking and jiving" and told two attorneys in his chambers about his "smoking hot 10″ dental hygienist whom he would let "do whatever she wanted" to him, the commission said.
In 2015, Bennett told a deputy district attorney that his position in a criminal case was "chicken shit" and that he wouldn't tolerate the DA bringing such charges when he took over the court's master calendar department, the complaint said.
At various times, Bennett openly criticized other judges in the courthouse for "playing along with the prosecutors' games,"and said he was "sick" of being "bad mouthed" by attorneys in the district attorney's office "in the newspapers and otherwise," the commission said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanta Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
4 minute readChief Justice Patricia Guerrero Says Recent Drop in Straight Grants Isn't Permanent
3 minute readScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
AI Is Not the Answer: The Case for Human Court Transcriptionists
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250