Calif. Business Group, Citing COVID-19, Asks for 90-Day Halt to PAGA Suits
Plaintiffs attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan, who brings employment lawsuits under California's Private Attorneys General Act, called the proposed move "outrageous." "This isn't the time for employers to say, 'yeah, we're off the hook, let's suspend the rule of law,'" she said.
March 26, 2020 at 05:15 PM
3 minute read
A California business group has sent a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom to impose a 90-day moratorium on lawsuits brought under the state's Private Attorneys General Act in light of the COVID-19 outbreak.
The letter, sent on Wednesday by the California Business and Industrial Alliance, says so-called PAGA notices continue unabated despite the unprecedented impact the coronavirus has had on employers, particularly those in the health care field. Last week alone, lawyers filed 167 claims under PAGA, which, "while lucrative for trial lawyers, often cost businesses thousands if not millions of dollars in settlement and legal fees," the letter says.
"These attorneys aren't even slowing down," said the group's founder, Tom Manzo, who filed the letter. "They're not even taking a pause and what's even more repulsive is they're attacking businesses that we're all going to need as a society right now."
"Imagine this hospice care center dealing with who knows what is mentally on their mind and now all of a sudden the owner says you got this PAGA notice and your attorney says this could cost you millions," Manzo said. "This is horrible timing for all of this."
The letter asks Newsom to issue an executive order.
Plaintiffs lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan, of Lichten & Liss-Riordan, who often brings PAGA lawsuits, called the move "outrageous."
"This is pretty outrageous for employers to call for a moratorium on claims right now when we need our legal system now more than ever," she said. "We know things will be slowed down a bit because courts are struggling and closing and open only for emergencies, but to say workers can't even file a PAGA claim at this time is a bridge too far."
COVID-19 could raise employment issues such as whether layoffs were required, how to keep track of time working from home and paying for unused equipment, she said. She noted that the courts could decide penalties later, even reducing that amount, given that employers are facing an unprecedented crisis.
"There are so many employment issues implicated by this unprecedented crisis," she said. "This isn't the time for employers to say, 'yeah, we're off the hook, let's suspend the rule of law.' "
PAGA, which is part of California's Labor Code, allows employees to bring lawsuits seeking civil penalties on behalf of themselves or other employees alleging a wide range of alleged violations, such as missed lunch breaks or unpaid overtime, against employers.
Manzo said he formed CBIA nearly three years ago to reform PAGA through legislation. The group represents about 150 small and midsize businesses and has a pending lawsuit against California seeking to reform PAGA.
Its letter to the governor noted that PAGA claims filed in the past week included those against hospitals, such as Cedars-Sinai, and other such health care entities as senior care homes.
"It's shameful that trial attorneys are targeting our state's hospitals and health care services," the letter says. "As the virus continues to wreak havoc on our economy, these lawsuits could spell even more ruin for much-needed Golden State medical services and businesses at-large."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute read'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
- 1The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 2New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 3Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 42024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 5What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250